Dear lawman, I do have respect for you as a rath
Post# of 154910
(Total Views: 460)
Posted On: 08/29/2019 11:41:36 AM
Re: the lawman #6905
Dear lawman,
I do have respect for you as a rather large shareholder. I'm myself disagree.
The reason, behind it, is that I've seen many other *seasoned* CEOs and how they drove their next assignment down to the ground. From a business perspective, I see them just coming in a changing everything, *if they do anything*, so upon success they can say it was all about their changes. They only care about the image, and paycheck, and not shareholders.
What happens, in reality, no two products are the same. They don't take the time for a years or two to digest the product, meet the customers, and understand the market need. And put up a business plan, to see if their number, will work out.
So, if they get lucky, they will get away, and it will work out. Just because the product was so good, and built right.
What is good about Nader, is that, he has lots of videos and speeches, and I can see right through him (Noting that I can he is really on the shareholder's side). If we put someone else there We wouldn't know what is going on until 2 or 3 years later, if there is a corp there.
So, I'd strongly suggest you and any other's voting, think who is better for your investment. After all you are here to make money, and you don't know who the next Nader will be. Are we willing to take a risk, and bring someone very seasoned CEO's like in SGYP, GERN, ONCS and many others brought on board, and managed to make all incorrect decisions.
No need to say, my mid 6 digit shares will vote this way.
I do have respect for you as a rather large shareholder. I'm myself disagree.
The reason, behind it, is that I've seen many other *seasoned* CEOs and how they drove their next assignment down to the ground. From a business perspective, I see them just coming in a changing everything, *if they do anything*, so upon success they can say it was all about their changes. They only care about the image, and paycheck, and not shareholders.
What happens, in reality, no two products are the same. They don't take the time for a years or two to digest the product, meet the customers, and understand the market need. And put up a business plan, to see if their number, will work out.
So, if they get lucky, they will get away, and it will work out. Just because the product was so good, and built right.
What is good about Nader, is that, he has lots of videos and speeches, and I can see right through him (Noting that I can he is really on the shareholder's side). If we put someone else there We wouldn't know what is going on until 2 or 3 years later, if there is a corp there.
So, I'd strongly suggest you and any other's voting, think who is better for your investment. After all you are here to make money, and you don't know who the next Nader will be. Are we willing to take a risk, and bring someone very seasoned CEO's like in SGYP, GERN, ONCS and many others brought on board, and managed to make all incorrect decisions.
No need to say, my mid 6 digit shares will vote this way.
(3)
(0)