Fred- Mits can elucidate further- but I dont think
Post# of 9137
(Total Views: 603)
Posted On: 08/23/2019 11:43:07 PM
Re: mitstevfel #4968
Fred- Mits can elucidate further- but I dont think the efficacy of the N-assay is in question- as Mits explained Dr's apparently wanted a pre-test to provide INITIAL results in minutes- and so that is the course that is being pursued.
it would not be logical to pursue a pretest if the N-assay did not work.
And logic tells me the pretest should not take as long as it took to develop the N-assay. Remember the awards Dr Faro won from his peers re the N-assay.
whenever replacing current tech and current supplier dynamics,pharma seems to want everything handed to them on a platter-so thats the process nnlx is pursuing.
and due to the california pharma partner, nnlx should have a built in distributor
it would not be logical to pursue a pretest if the N-assay did not work.
And logic tells me the pretest should not take as long as it took to develop the N-assay. Remember the awards Dr Faro won from his peers re the N-assay.
whenever replacing current tech and current supplier dynamics,pharma seems to want everything handed to them on a platter-so thats the process nnlx is pursuing.
and due to the california pharma partner, nnlx should have a built in distributor
(1)
(1)Nanologix Inc (NNLX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼