You wouldn't have to use SeaSearcher to prove you'

You wouldn't have to use SeaSearcher to prove you're legit, but other than that I agree with this next statement, except with the made up convict claim you said you read on the internet, which is amusing. If you simply found the wreck Kyle claimed you were on over 3 years ago, you might have some cred, with or without SeaSearcher.

Quote:

---

The proof, Convict, will be when treasure is pulled up that was found using the Seasearcher. Until then I very happy to rest easy with the evidence we have all already seen.

---

What evidence? Promo interviews?

Quote:

---

Why hasn't the CEO taken a salary in 12 years?

---

You really think he deserves a salary?

Quote:

---

Why haven't "related parties" sold shares?

---

Prove they haven't. I see in the FINS many relatives get paid in shares for services, some of which seem absurd. Regardless provide proof no relatives have sold. I recall Kyle fighting disclosure regarding who sold shares.

I look forward to the proof relatives haven't sold shares. Did you read that on the internet too? If so, can you not link it because I changed my alias?

Quote:

---

Why are the investors who bought 100s of millions of shares over the past 9 months not selling their shares?

---

Who did they buy those shares from, relatives? Someone is selling. I have read many shareholders did take profits, but yes it's in a downtrend since early Spring.