The evidence of fraud is potentially vast, it’s

The evidence of fraud is potentially vast, it’s referred to as stock manipulation. It’s the intentional disclosure of false/misleading information in order to encourage stock volume/activity. The false/misleading information encourages interest in the “company” at specific periods of time therefore it also sustains or provokes a rise in share price. The intention behind this antic once again is to encourage the sale of toxic conversions and/or personal shares. Steve Berman’s tweets, shareholder letters, and financials are susceptible documentation which can be reviewed by the SEC. All complaints filed with the SEC are reviewed and the SEC chooses whether or not further investigation and charges are pursued. We will have to let the SEC do their due diligence and decipher if Steve’s statements regarding time and dates of share reduction, move to Colorado, PL deals, name/company change to Hexagon holdings, financial statements potentially missing timely disclosures regarding debt all fell within accordance of the law or if these facets were used to manipulate the share price/volume at specific periods of time, etc. Does that answer your question regarding my statement?