5 Absurd Attempts to Equate Right-Wing Terrorists With Left-Wing Groups
Written by Kali Holloway / AlterNet September 6, 2017
Nearly two more years of convincing data further corroborate the premise of this article.
https://www.alternet.org/2017/09/5-absurd-att...ng-groups/
1. Right-wing extremists commit nearly all political violence in America.
The far right—an umbrella term that includes white nationalists, neo-fascists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, alt-right adherents, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant groups, anti-government militias, and anti-abortion fanatics like clinic bombers— are the heirs apparent of violent right-wing terror groups dating to the earliest eras of American history.
It’s therefore not terribly surprising that based on every statistical measure, as Mother Jones notes, they have “held a near-monopoly on political violence since the 1980s.”
2. Violence is central to far-right ideology.
What do conservatives want to conserve? Mostly, “traditional America,” the version of the country they think is so great. Their vision of the U.S. is homogeneously white and Christian, free of immigrants who don’t speak English and LGBT people forming non-heterosexual unions.
On a scale that goes from Proud Boys to neo-Nazis, from Western chauvinists to hardline racists, there’s an underlying philosophy of rejection of a human other.* (Editor's Update:
A lawyer for the Proud Boys who is also a self-described member of the organization has challenged their inclusion in this article. See more at the bottom of this article.) As sociologist and criminologist Stanislav Vysotsky has written, “When even the most moderate position the alt-right or fascist movement can take is racial separation or nationalism through forcible repatriation and strict border control, including forced deportations and racialized exclusions, that movement is inherently violent.”
Matthew Rozsa, writing at Salon, notes:
Indeed, far-right violence is embedded in the very iconography embraced by that movement. As historian David Blight has pointed out, Civil War symbols like the Confederate memorials being taken down in Charlottesville (which was what prompted members of the far right to assemble there) were created in large part to reinforce a code of white supremacy throughout the United States.
The event such memorials commemorated, it must be remembered, was also one rooted in violence — a collection of states using anti-government rhetoric to protect a white supremacist society through violent rebellion against the federal government.
From the Black Panthers to contemporary antifa, far-left groups that have embraced violence have done so with a sense of finality and self-protection, recognizing that violence is the only language their opposition understands
3. Right-wing terrorists attack people, while left-wing groups mostly target property.
The University of Maryland study co-authored by LaFree found “far-right individuals were more likely to commit violence against people, while those on the far left were more likely to commit property damage.”
SPLC’s Beirich told the Nation “eco- and animal-rights extremists caused extensive property damage in the 1990s, but didn’t target people.”
There’s a debate to be had about whether property damage is an effective statement of political protest or tool of social change. There is not a valid discussion to be had on whether hurting property is the same as hurting people.
4. Antifa is not backed by mainstream progressives, while Republicans have embraced the far right.
There are no highly visible progressives, prominent liberals or Democratic stars who have risked their own public image to defend antifa. In fact, they’re far more likely to parrot the bothsideism of the right, ridiculously and illogically equating fascists and anti-fascists.
Republicans, on the other hand, have nearly fallen over themselves to let right-wing extremists know they approve of their ideas and welcome them to the party.
Lots of Republican lawmakers, including Rand Paul, applauded Cliven Bundy’s armed standoff with the federal government. House Minority Leader John Boehner bashed a 2009 Department of Homeland Security report on rising right-wing threats including hate groups. In the weeks after Dylann Roof’s killing rampage, there were GOP voices still proudly defending the Confederate flag.
The current administration has been transparently supportive of the alt-right. Steve Bannon boasted about turning Breitbart into the "platform of the alt-right." The White House has given press passes to alt-right trolls Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec. And Donald Trump has been vocal in expressing his sympathy for neo-Nazis since Charlottesville. As the Daily Beast’s Dean Obeidallah succinctly notes, “antifa is not part of the Democratic Party, while white supremacists are part of the GOP.”
5. Community service is part of the mission of antifa.
The Panthers served free breakfast to schoolchildren, along with 60 other community programs including health care clinics and free legal aid. Antifa groups like the Redneck Revolution run “food programs, community gardens, clothing programs, and needle exchanges in addition to their armed self-defense programs.”
Black Lives Matter and antifa groups were both on the ground during Hurricane Harvey handing out food and supplies to survivors. At the Boston anti-Nazi rally, members of BLM escorted white nationalists through the crowd to ensure their safety.
It would be absurd to pretend members of antifa don’t engage in violence. But when was the last time you heard about the Klan handing out food to poor people or the alt-right setting up education programs for at-risk kids? You haven’t, ever, and if you decide to wait for such an event to take place, you should probably get your affairs in order first.
* Editor's Note: On September 12, Proud Boys lawyer and self-described member of the organization Jason L. Van Dyke sent AlterNet a letter rejecting the group’s inclusion in the article, and in particular, the following passage:
“What do conservatives want to conserve? Mostly, “traditional America,” the version of the country they think is so great. Their vision of the U.S. is homogeneously white and Christian, free of immigrants who don’t speak English and LGBT people forming non-heterosexual unions. On a scale that goes from Proud Boys to neo-Nazis, from Western chauvinists to hardline racists, there’s an underlying philosophy of rejection of a human other. As sociologist and criminologist Stanislav Vysotsky has written, “When even the most moderate position the alt-right or fascist movement can take is racial separation or nationalism through forcible repatriation and strict border control, including forced deportations and racialized exclusions, that movement is inherently violent.”
Van Dyke wrote, “The Proud Boys are not white nationalists, white supremacists, fascist or part of the alt-right. It is a multi-racial fraternity that openly accepts homosexuals as members. It does not share a vision of the U.S. as a nation that is “homogeneously white and Christian” or “free of LGBT people forming non-heterosexual unions.” The Proud Boys does not embrace any kind of philosophy of “rejection of a human other” and regularly welcomes members from all walks of life. That is the truth, and your writer has chosen to ignore it.”
On the other hand....pun intended. I wonder if it's OK to masturbate, just ONE last time, while getting your tattoo? The irony in a bunch of jerkoffs not being allowed to is, well, just too fucking rich.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proud_Boys
Membership
Proud Boys at a rally in Seattle, 2017
The Proud Boys say they have an initiation process that has four stages and includes hazing. The first stage is a loyalty oath , on the order of "I’m a proud Western chauvinist, I refuse to apologize for creating the modern world"; the second is getting punched until the person recites pop culture trivia , such as the names of five breakfast cereals; the third is getting a tattoo and agreeing to not masturbate; and the fourth is getting into a major fight "for the cause ."[24][17][47][48][49][50]
The Proud Boys have adopted a black Fred Perry polo shirt with yellow piping as their unofficial uniform.[51] Fred Perry was previously associated with the Mod subculture and skinhead groups,[51][52] including the British National Front.[53] Fred Perry's CEO John Flynn denounced the affiliation with the Proud Boys in a statement to CBC Radio, saying "We don't support the ideals or the group that you speak of. It is counter to our beliefs and the people we work with."[52]
Women and transgender men are not allowed in the organization.[54][36]
The Proud Boys discourages its members from masturbating and watching pornography so as to motivate them to get "off the couch" and meet women.[49] McInnes added no masturbation to the group's core ideas after interacting with Dante Nero, a relationship expert and comedian with a podcast on Riotcast, who came to serve as a sort of "pope" for this idea within the organization.[55]
Written by Kali Holloway / AlterNet September 6, 2017
Nearly two more years of convincing data further corroborate the premise of this article.
https://www.alternet.org/2017/09/5-absurd-att...ng-groups/
1. Right-wing extremists commit nearly all political violence in America.
The far right—an umbrella term that includes white nationalists, neo-fascists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, alt-right adherents, anti-Muslim and anti-immigrant groups, anti-government militias, and anti-abortion fanatics like clinic bombers— are the heirs apparent of violent right-wing terror groups dating to the earliest eras of American history.
It’s therefore not terribly surprising that based on every statistical measure, as Mother Jones notes, they have “held a near-monopoly on political violence since the 1980s.”
2. Violence is central to far-right ideology.
What do conservatives want to conserve? Mostly, “traditional America,” the version of the country they think is so great. Their vision of the U.S. is homogeneously white and Christian, free of immigrants who don’t speak English and LGBT people forming non-heterosexual unions.
On a scale that goes from Proud Boys to neo-Nazis, from Western chauvinists to hardline racists, there’s an underlying philosophy of rejection of a human other.* (Editor's Update:
A lawyer for the Proud Boys who is also a self-described member of the organization has challenged their inclusion in this article. See more at the bottom of this article.) As sociologist and criminologist Stanislav Vysotsky has written, “When even the most moderate position the alt-right or fascist movement can take is racial separation or nationalism through forcible repatriation and strict border control, including forced deportations and racialized exclusions, that movement is inherently violent.”
Matthew Rozsa, writing at Salon, notes:
Indeed, far-right violence is embedded in the very iconography embraced by that movement. As historian David Blight has pointed out, Civil War symbols like the Confederate memorials being taken down in Charlottesville (which was what prompted members of the far right to assemble there) were created in large part to reinforce a code of white supremacy throughout the United States.
The event such memorials commemorated, it must be remembered, was also one rooted in violence — a collection of states using anti-government rhetoric to protect a white supremacist society through violent rebellion against the federal government.
From the Black Panthers to contemporary antifa, far-left groups that have embraced violence have done so with a sense of finality and self-protection, recognizing that violence is the only language their opposition understands
3. Right-wing terrorists attack people, while left-wing groups mostly target property.
The University of Maryland study co-authored by LaFree found “far-right individuals were more likely to commit violence against people, while those on the far left were more likely to commit property damage.”
SPLC’s Beirich told the Nation “eco- and animal-rights extremists caused extensive property damage in the 1990s, but didn’t target people.”
There’s a debate to be had about whether property damage is an effective statement of political protest or tool of social change. There is not a valid discussion to be had on whether hurting property is the same as hurting people.
4. Antifa is not backed by mainstream progressives, while Republicans have embraced the far right.
There are no highly visible progressives, prominent liberals or Democratic stars who have risked their own public image to defend antifa. In fact, they’re far more likely to parrot the bothsideism of the right, ridiculously and illogically equating fascists and anti-fascists.
Republicans, on the other hand, have nearly fallen over themselves to let right-wing extremists know they approve of their ideas and welcome them to the party.
Lots of Republican lawmakers, including Rand Paul, applauded Cliven Bundy’s armed standoff with the federal government. House Minority Leader John Boehner bashed a 2009 Department of Homeland Security report on rising right-wing threats including hate groups. In the weeks after Dylann Roof’s killing rampage, there were GOP voices still proudly defending the Confederate flag.
The current administration has been transparently supportive of the alt-right. Steve Bannon boasted about turning Breitbart into the "platform of the alt-right." The White House has given press passes to alt-right trolls Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec. And Donald Trump has been vocal in expressing his sympathy for neo-Nazis since Charlottesville. As the Daily Beast’s Dean Obeidallah succinctly notes, “antifa is not part of the Democratic Party, while white supremacists are part of the GOP.”
5. Community service is part of the mission of antifa.
The Panthers served free breakfast to schoolchildren, along with 60 other community programs including health care clinics and free legal aid. Antifa groups like the Redneck Revolution run “food programs, community gardens, clothing programs, and needle exchanges in addition to their armed self-defense programs.”
Black Lives Matter and antifa groups were both on the ground during Hurricane Harvey handing out food and supplies to survivors. At the Boston anti-Nazi rally, members of BLM escorted white nationalists through the crowd to ensure their safety.
It would be absurd to pretend members of antifa don’t engage in violence. But when was the last time you heard about the Klan handing out food to poor people or the alt-right setting up education programs for at-risk kids? You haven’t, ever, and if you decide to wait for such an event to take place, you should probably get your affairs in order first.
* Editor's Note: On September 12, Proud Boys lawyer and self-described member of the organization Jason L. Van Dyke sent AlterNet a letter rejecting the group’s inclusion in the article, and in particular, the following passage:
“What do conservatives want to conserve? Mostly, “traditional America,” the version of the country they think is so great. Their vision of the U.S. is homogeneously white and Christian, free of immigrants who don’t speak English and LGBT people forming non-heterosexual unions. On a scale that goes from Proud Boys to neo-Nazis, from Western chauvinists to hardline racists, there’s an underlying philosophy of rejection of a human other. As sociologist and criminologist Stanislav Vysotsky has written, “When even the most moderate position the alt-right or fascist movement can take is racial separation or nationalism through forcible repatriation and strict border control, including forced deportations and racialized exclusions, that movement is inherently violent.”
Van Dyke wrote, “The Proud Boys are not white nationalists, white supremacists, fascist or part of the alt-right. It is a multi-racial fraternity that openly accepts homosexuals as members. It does not share a vision of the U.S. as a nation that is “homogeneously white and Christian” or “free of LGBT people forming non-heterosexual unions.” The Proud Boys does not embrace any kind of philosophy of “rejection of a human other” and regularly welcomes members from all walks of life. That is the truth, and your writer has chosen to ignore it.”
On the other hand....pun intended. I wonder if it's OK to masturbate, just ONE last time, while getting your tattoo? The irony in a bunch of jerkoffs not being allowed to is, well, just too fucking rich.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proud_Boys
Membership
Proud Boys at a rally in Seattle, 2017
The Proud Boys say they have an initiation process that has four stages and includes hazing. The first stage is a loyalty oath , on the order of "I’m a proud Western chauvinist, I refuse to apologize for creating the modern world"; the second is getting punched until the person recites pop culture trivia , such as the names of five breakfast cereals; the third is getting a tattoo and agreeing to not masturbate; and the fourth is getting into a major fight "for the cause ."[24][17][47][48][49][50]
The Proud Boys have adopted a black Fred Perry polo shirt with yellow piping as their unofficial uniform.[51] Fred Perry was previously associated with the Mod subculture and skinhead groups,[51][52] including the British National Front.[53] Fred Perry's CEO John Flynn denounced the affiliation with the Proud Boys in a statement to CBC Radio, saying "We don't support the ideals or the group that you speak of. It is counter to our beliefs and the people we work with."[52]
Women and transgender men are not allowed in the organization.[54][36]
The Proud Boys discourages its members from masturbating and watching pornography so as to motivate them to get "off the couch" and meet women.[49] McInnes added no masturbation to the group's core ideas after interacting with Dante Nero, a relationship expert and comedian with a podcast on Riotcast, who came to serve as a sort of "pope" for this idea within the organization.[55]
