because NR imo is a bunch of colluding entities ..
Post# of 72440
who think nothing of illegally manipulating equities regardless of where traded
(and the OTC is particularly note worthy for NRs' manipulation) because the
odds of getting caught are slim to none .. and if caught .. fine levied by some
of NRs' former employer (SEC) .. is made up elsewhere in mere seconds on
another target
just how difficult is it to place an entity within sites .. such as IR firms
.. the SEC .. attorney firms or numerous other areas? .. story of a *trader*
working a legal firm's employee (for months) at the local watering hole .. was
done specifically for sourcing info
but mostly why i believe it .. is because i read and note % ratios
it was crystal clear *ratios* re: post negativity and infestation on this SMB and
the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation .. were amped significantly
earlier this year
as i've noted *here* .. effective 9.12.18 .. NR undertook bogus volume
(those efforts were aided and abetted by those *seeded* onto various SMBs
.. PRO/CON are embedded pre NRs' cycles of money .. which on IPIX/CTIX
ran from 9/2012 to 12/2014 .. b4 the *hand off* and unrelenting .. and continuing
efforts of 2015) .. we know what mgmt actually diluted .. which was no where
near NRs' efforts .. NR follows a very consistent playbook/agenda when they are
upside down on an OTC target .. EOY 2018 .. NR set up 52 week low @ 7c on 12.31.18
that set up imo remained mostly stalled for Jan/Feb 2019
that pattern changed out in total on March 1st 2019 (DRS %s)
that pattern was *added* to on April 26th 2019 ( hidden trade %s begin morphing up food chain)
March's pattern then changed out in early May 2019
on May 3rd NR *tested* on *ask* @ 19c (stopped @ approx 11AM)
that imo was NRs' set up of what would come to pass the following week
which as i've previously noted was done to negate *impact* of IP's PR of 5.16.19
btw i was just checking that date's historical on IPIX
Quote:
04/26/2019 0.1182 0.1395 0.115 0.139 302,531
imo it's always worth noting where the 3 that matter re: IPIX *are placed* on both bid and ask .. those 3 remain CDEL/ETRF/NITE
anyone watching last week .. would have noted where NITE was placed on bid
imo signaling intent .. if able to by NR .. who can forget NRs' slow but relentless
compression for years after the hand off of 2015 .. and when NR *accelerated* efforts
NR has 3 choices ..
stall the PPS (as has been done in years previously) .. don't see that one myself
do the walk down on *volume* that may or may not meet 10/90 day maintenance
avgs .. to attempt to reset the 52 week low of 7c done on 12.31.18 (always a goal)
or do another controlled mini take up (my guess is 37c to 45c) .. sans news so as
to not lose control for the then requisite reset back down
imo it's a toss up regarding odds re: 2 or 3 .. pursued by NR .. 2 weeks ago
it looked as tho' another mini take up would ensue .. this past week just the
opposite .. regardless of NR .. their *dilemma* remains .. IP investors and
imo an aware mgmt's continued ability to execute via a diverse platform
as i posted previously .. NR has an interesting dilemma en route .. specific
to what was done and when re: 52 week high/s reset and 52 week low/s reset
at this time last year .. specifically July into Sept
https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=5482563
i'll do a follow on post to this in a bit ..
edited in .. not asked .. but imo needs to be noted too
imo like other OTC targets that have outlasted/survived NRs' decade long effort
.. it's an issue of *settlement*
4kids
Quote:
4kids in your opinion how would they know this?
"i have been convinced since earlier
this year .. that NR knows *exactly* the news en route via IP .. just not the timing of it"