I was replying to your assertion of NNLX's "lack

I was replying to your assertion of NNLX's "lack of willingness to even partner with a big boy"

As I pointed out NNLX has a long history of partnering with govt agencies,the africa tb initiatitive w NIH and the Bill Gates Foundation etc.

But instead of honestly recognizing you were wrong in recklessly saying NNLX's, "lack of willingness to even partner with a big boy",you changed the narrative- a dishonest magicians trick- to one re NNLX's success or lack thereof with big boys.

I've been letting you run bc I knew you would expose yourself as a NNLX hater irrespective of any facts
(besides which your posts began just after elsie was banned and elsies posts began right after pumpkin was banned,so its very possible you've been banned twice already).

Some of NNLX's endeavors w govt agencies concerned the BNP which has been superseded by the N-Assay

Re NIH and the Bill Gates Foundation how do you propose NNLX control organizations at least hundreds of times larger than NNLX?

Re past attempts at partnerships w big pharma I've explained at length many times the unequal negotiating process, which usually results in the destruction of the smaller company

but NNLX 's partnership w the california pharma company is more a part of the public arena as i pointed out-something which you ignored also