You're definitely right, Gandalf. I suppose I don
Post# of 43064
(Total Views: 436)
Posted On: 07/04/2019 11:11:30 AM
You're definitely right, Gandalf. I suppose I don't mind posting warnings about PTOI in case someone new runs across the stock.
You're also right that it's the same story. When I first ran across PTOI/JBII, the company was already following the script of maybe a dozen or so scams I had run across prior to it...and to top that off, quick math immediately showed that PTOI's statements were fraudulent.
Maybe I should have prefaced my initial posts with 'spoiler alert' when I told everyone how PTOI's story would play out with the company announcing continuous delays and excuses forever in a feigned quest to get any processor put into worthwhile production.
I would say most of what anyone posts here these days could be copy-and-pasted so I'm guessing your issue is actually with my content. The only change over the years is from investors starting to get frustrated with the ever-lengthening time lines. And again, those are the excuses and delays I mentioned would happen from the very beginning in my tired old story.
I'll make a deal with you, Gandalf, since you seem to value my silence. If in the next few days you post your opinion as to why Mr. Heddle doesn't disclose how well the process works (inputs vs outputs) then I'll stop posting for three months. Remember that PTOI founder Mr. Bordynuik was very clear about PTOI's value proposition: the cost was supposedly $10/bbl to produce ( "You literally have to make up costs" ) and the output was supposedly worth WTI-$3 (still around $55) for which he supposedly had offers in hand from more than one refinery. Why does Mr. Heddle instead stay silent?? Announcing that information and maybe proving it would get enough investment money flooding into PTOI to build a bustling operation.
I'll even open that offer up to anyone who wants to answer, but for only one month instead of the three I'm offering you.
...
You're also right that it's the same story. When I first ran across PTOI/JBII, the company was already following the script of maybe a dozen or so scams I had run across prior to it...and to top that off, quick math immediately showed that PTOI's statements were fraudulent.
Maybe I should have prefaced my initial posts with 'spoiler alert' when I told everyone how PTOI's story would play out with the company announcing continuous delays and excuses forever in a feigned quest to get any processor put into worthwhile production.
I would say most of what anyone posts here these days could be copy-and-pasted so I'm guessing your issue is actually with my content. The only change over the years is from investors starting to get frustrated with the ever-lengthening time lines. And again, those are the excuses and delays I mentioned would happen from the very beginning in my tired old story.
I'll make a deal with you, Gandalf, since you seem to value my silence. If in the next few days you post your opinion as to why Mr. Heddle doesn't disclose how well the process works (inputs vs outputs) then I'll stop posting for three months. Remember that PTOI founder Mr. Bordynuik was very clear about PTOI's value proposition: the cost was supposedly $10/bbl to produce ( "You literally have to make up costs" ) and the output was supposedly worth WTI-$3 (still around $55) for which he supposedly had offers in hand from more than one refinery. Why does Mr. Heddle instead stay silent?? Announcing that information and maybe proving it would get enough investment money flooding into PTOI to build a bustling operation.
I'll even open that offer up to anyone who wants to answer, but for only one month instead of the three I'm offering you.
...
(0)
(0)Plastic2Oil, Inc. (PTOI) Stock Research Links
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.
Scroll down for more posts ▼