Why is San Francisco ... covered in human feces?
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 91)
Posted On: 07/03/2019 5:29:56 PM
Re: dukelasilver #62547
Why is San Francisco ... covered in human feces?
A city covered in poop is so disgusting it has to be almost comical. But the uptick in street defecation is the symbol of a human tragedy. People aren’t pooping on the streets because they have suddenly forgotten what a bathroom is, or unlearned basic hygiene. The incidents are part of a broader failure of the city to provide for the basic needs of its citizens, and show the catastrophic, socially destructive effects of unchecked inequality.
The city has installed 25 small self-cleaning public toilets and recently commissioned a set of futuristic-looking new bathrooms, but a few dozen toilets for a city of 870,000 is woefully insufficient. Bathroom access should be considered a basic right, and it’s worth considering the idea of banning “customers only” toilets. In a city with generous public spaces and a commitment to equal access, no one would ever have to use the street.
HIGH TAXES TOO
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/201...melessness
HIGH TAXES TOO
I KNOW ( {} ) I KNOW ( () ) They are saving the Money to " REDISTRIBUTE " to The Red States
What would the PORE REPUBS do doo with out the DEMOCRATS
A city covered in poop is so disgusting it has to be almost comical. But the uptick in street defecation is the symbol of a human tragedy. People aren’t pooping on the streets because they have suddenly forgotten what a bathroom is, or unlearned basic hygiene. The incidents are part of a broader failure of the city to provide for the basic needs of its citizens, and show the catastrophic, socially destructive effects of unchecked inequality.
The city has installed 25 small self-cleaning public toilets and recently commissioned a set of futuristic-looking new bathrooms, but a few dozen toilets for a city of 870,000 is woefully insufficient. Bathroom access should be considered a basic right, and it’s worth considering the idea of banning “customers only” toilets. In a city with generous public spaces and a commitment to equal access, no one would ever have to use the street.
HIGH TAXES TOO
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/201...melessness
HIGH TAXES TOO
I KNOW ( {} ) I KNOW ( () ) They are saving the Money to " REDISTRIBUTE " to The Red States
What would the PORE REPUBS do doo with out the DEMOCRATS
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼