On the surface that appears logical. However, in t
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 388)
Posted On: 06/21/2019 10:09:59 AM
On the surface that appears logical. However, in the past, you have publicly accused and attacked shareholders who did that very thing of trying to get inside information out of you. There was a void of information and worse, a lot of disinformation sent out by your IR group that needed to be addressed and responded to. That never happened. When shareholders tried to clarify what was legitimate, you accused them of trying to get inside infomation to trade on and that they were trying to kill deals in the works. Then your IR group that morphed into the MRVB trading platform piled on.
So calling you doesn't really provide shareholders any more information than this forum or Twitter. However, it is much easier to hang up on then or ignore them rather than deal with the questions or issues you refuse to answer or address. Yes, both forums are filled overwhelmingly with those dealing in misinformation trying to move the stock. However, the worst player in that realm was your very own IR person or group who repeatedly made ridiculously speculative claims about revenues and profits that you never corrected. Only long after the fact did you distance yourself from the MRVB group and say they were a completely separate entity and did not speak for the company. However, James even said on the conference call he was speaking on behalf of the company when you were reportedly ill with food poisoning and could not join the call.
Investors still don't know what happened with the guaranteed contract James repeatedly verified that showed the NAVAIR certification and SLA relationships were finally paying off for investors. $13.5 million a year for 10 years. Verified in a company conference call. You were asked to issue an 8K verfiying details due to the impact of such a large contract. If it never existed or James was speaking out of turn, an 8K should have been issued clearing up the confusion for investors.
What happened?
So calling you doesn't really provide shareholders any more information than this forum or Twitter. However, it is much easier to hang up on then or ignore them rather than deal with the questions or issues you refuse to answer or address. Yes, both forums are filled overwhelmingly with those dealing in misinformation trying to move the stock. However, the worst player in that realm was your very own IR person or group who repeatedly made ridiculously speculative claims about revenues and profits that you never corrected. Only long after the fact did you distance yourself from the MRVB group and say they were a completely separate entity and did not speak for the company. However, James even said on the conference call he was speaking on behalf of the company when you were reportedly ill with food poisoning and could not join the call.
Investors still don't know what happened with the guaranteed contract James repeatedly verified that showed the NAVAIR certification and SLA relationships were finally paying off for investors. $13.5 million a year for 10 years. Verified in a company conference call. You were asked to issue an 8K verfiying details due to the impact of such a large contract. If it never existed or James was speaking out of turn, an 8K should have been issued clearing up the confusion for investors.
What happened?
(2)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼