Hearings on June 4th for: STATE OF PATENT ELIGIBIL
Post# of 82672
(Total Views: 470)
Posted On: 06/12/2019 9:56:31 AM
Hearings on June 4th for: STATE OF PATENT ELIGIBILITY IN AMERICA
Committee on the Judiciary: Subcommittee on Intellectual Property concluded a hearing to examine the state of patent eligibility in America, after receiving testimony from Paul R. Michel, former Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Q. Todd Dickinson, Polsinelli, PC, Charles Duan, R Street Institute, Michael M. Rosen, American Enterprise Institute, and Patrick Kilbride, United States Chamber of Commerce, all of Washington, D.C.; David J. Kappos, Cravath, Swaine and Moore LLP, New York, New York; Jeffrey A. Lefstin, University of California Hastings College of the Law, and Alex H. Moss, Electronic Frontier Foundation, both of San Francisco, California; Robert A. Armitage, IP Strategy and Policy, McLean, Virginia; David O. Taylor, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, Dallas, Texas; Sherry M. Knowles, Knowles Intellectual Property Strategies, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia; Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School, Stanford, California; Paul R. Gugliuzza, Boston University School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts; Joshua D. Sarnoff, DePaul University College of Law, Chicago, Illinois; and Adam Mossoff, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, Arlington, Virginia.
Hearings on June 5th for: STATE OF PATENT ELIGIBILITY IN AMERICA
Committee on the Judiciary: Subcommittee on Intellectual Property concluded a hearing to examine the state of patent eligibility in America, after receiving testimony from Barbara A. Fiacco, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Arlington, Virginia; Scott Partridge, American Bar Association, Houston, Texas; Henry Hadad, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Princeton, New Jersey; David Jones, High Tech Inventors Alliance, Stephanie Martz, National Retail Federation, on behalf of United for Patent Reform, William Jenks, The Internet Association, Christopher A. Mohr, Software and Information Industry Association, Jeffrey K. Francer, Association for Accessible Medicines, Hans Sauer, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, and Natalie Derzko, Covington and Burling LLP, on behalf of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, all of Washington, D.C.; Paul Morinville, US Inventor, Inc., Highland, Indiana; Philip S. Johnson, Coalition for 21st Century Patent Reform, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Jeffrey A. Birchak, Fallbrook Technologies, Inc., Austin, Texas, on behalf of the Innovation Alliance; Rick Brandon, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, on behalf of the Association of American Universities; and Kate Ruane, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, New York.
Committee on the Judiciary: Subcommittee on Intellectual Property concluded a hearing to examine the state of patent eligibility in America, after receiving testimony from Paul R. Michel, former Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Q. Todd Dickinson, Polsinelli, PC, Charles Duan, R Street Institute, Michael M. Rosen, American Enterprise Institute, and Patrick Kilbride, United States Chamber of Commerce, all of Washington, D.C.; David J. Kappos, Cravath, Swaine and Moore LLP, New York, New York; Jeffrey A. Lefstin, University of California Hastings College of the Law, and Alex H. Moss, Electronic Frontier Foundation, both of San Francisco, California; Robert A. Armitage, IP Strategy and Policy, McLean, Virginia; David O. Taylor, Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law, Dallas, Texas; Sherry M. Knowles, Knowles Intellectual Property Strategies, LLC, Atlanta, Georgia; Mark A. Lemley, Stanford Law School, Stanford, California; Paul R. Gugliuzza, Boston University School of Law, Boston, Massachusetts; Joshua D. Sarnoff, DePaul University College of Law, Chicago, Illinois; and Adam Mossoff, George Mason University Antonin Scalia Law School, Arlington, Virginia.
Hearings on June 5th for: STATE OF PATENT ELIGIBILITY IN AMERICA
Committee on the Judiciary: Subcommittee on Intellectual Property concluded a hearing to examine the state of patent eligibility in America, after receiving testimony from Barbara A. Fiacco, American Intellectual Property Law Association, Arlington, Virginia; Scott Partridge, American Bar Association, Houston, Texas; Henry Hadad, Intellectual Property Owners Association, Princeton, New Jersey; David Jones, High Tech Inventors Alliance, Stephanie Martz, National Retail Federation, on behalf of United for Patent Reform, William Jenks, The Internet Association, Christopher A. Mohr, Software and Information Industry Association, Jeffrey K. Francer, Association for Accessible Medicines, Hans Sauer, Biotechnology Innovation Organization, and Natalie Derzko, Covington and Burling LLP, on behalf of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, all of Washington, D.C.; Paul Morinville, US Inventor, Inc., Highland, Indiana; Philip S. Johnson, Coalition for 21st Century Patent Reform, New Brunswick, New Jersey; Jeffrey A. Birchak, Fallbrook Technologies, Inc., Austin, Texas, on behalf of the Innovation Alliance; Rick Brandon, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, on behalf of the Association of American Universities; and Kate Ruane, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, New York.
(3)
(0)Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
WORDS TO LIVE BY:
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Get .... PrivacyLok https://cyberidguard.com/
Try SafeVchat: https://cyberidguard.com/
My comments are only my opinion and are not to be used for investment advice.
Please conduct your own due diligence before choosing to buy or sell any stock.
Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.
Get .... PrivacyLok https://cyberidguard.com/
Try SafeVchat: https://cyberidguard.com/
My comments are only my opinion and are not to be used for investment advice.
Please conduct your own due diligence before choosing to buy or sell any stock.
Scroll down for more posts ▼