Pete, I agree with you that IPIX is most likely to
Post# of 72440
I believe that WORDS MATTER and that if you read the IPIX PR’s carefully, they lay out some valuable nuggets of information.
The 5/16/19 Term Sheet PR was strictly for Ulcerative Proctitis / Proctosigmoiditis using locally administered foam, enema and gel. The Term Sheet has a Right of First Refusal (RFR) option for more extensive forms of IBD including Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s disease.
The 6/6/19 BDD PR was for an agreement to begin the development of tablets for targeted ORAL delivery of Brilacidin to the colon. IMO the IPIX/BDD agreement is not targeting instances that are included in the CORE piece of the Term Sheet. I believe the targeted instances using the BDD delivery technology fall under the Right of First Refusal as the BDD delivery system will compete in the Colitis and Crohn disease markets as a DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY as a non-biologic, non-corticosteroid option addressing a huge IBD market that is projected to be $48B in 2022.
The 5/16/19 and 6/6/19 PR’s MAY include the same Big Pharma ONLY if the Term Sheet Big Pharma exercise their Right of First Refusal. IPIX could have multiple license deals within the B-IBD space as well as a separate license deal for B-OM. These funding deals will fund multiple phase 2 and phase 3 trials. Brilacidin will be a franchise drug that will bring in multiple streams of income. This is a very exciting time to own a piece of this company.