and here's why documentation is NRs' achilles heel

and here's why documentation is NRs' achilles heel on an OTC target that outlasts
NRs' *efforts* .. in P2O's case it's 10 years

suspect ETRF has a compliance issue on PTOI .. they shut down their *bid* last week

of course i also know from actual P2O investors who use certain *firms* .. that their GTCs
get utilized upon occasion .. even when they are cash accts ..
contrary to what NRs' .. er .. *efforts* .. post

last month .. if memory serves .. word was sent to me that a brokerage firm
that always *routed* PTOI buys/bids .. via NITE .. had switched to CDEL
.. this was confirmed by at least 2 other *actual* P2O investors .. b4 being
changed out .. for a week or so

so why in the last month would some MMs (who have always abusively shorted PTOI)
change *tactics*?

the last aspect any NR entity wants known is what gets done .. let's not forget
the author of the first hit piece on P2O (July 2010) .. spent years promoting
bogus bs 24/7/365 via the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation that
there was no such thing as an OTC *stock* being *shorted* (legal or abusive)
that *scenario* of course had to be *adjusted* when Finra's link (at the behest
of the SEC) first went live back in Feb 2010 .. but i digress

NRs' issue goes back directly to the first *run* on PTOI in December 2009

for the most part .. i tend to only *focus* on what NR has *done* since P2O was
wrested back in mid August 2013

the biggest asset P2O has besides the founder's tech and company's enviable
share structure .. remains P2O's actual early/original investors .. many of whom
have never sold one share of PTOI

NRs' *dilemma* remains a settlement issue with P2O's ability to execute (first
sale with monies exchanged)

4kids