It would never make any sense to disclose how much
Post# of 32979
(Total Views: 503)
Posted On: 05/21/2019 1:08:47 PM
It would never make any sense to disclose how much one company was charged for a white label version vs another company. The results will speak for themselves in the quarterly earnings. There are some details you don't want competitors to know, and also of course in this case it is a case by case basis with each MLM company otherwise it would force the same pricing for each one.
I too was more than satisfied by the "300K to 1.8M per year" range, just get a few of those going and you have recurring revenue, which is what Wall Street likes. I have invested in other stocks that have one time "lump revenues" and that is not usually rewarded as well by Wall Street.
So when white label deals are announced, the skeptics say it is fluff. We know it is at least $300K annual revenue and that is the very bottom end, so everyone can make whatever estimate they want for a given deal. Probably also a factor is the size of the MLM operation and how many people doing sales for it.
I too was more than satisfied by the "300K to 1.8M per year" range, just get a few of those going and you have recurring revenue, which is what Wall Street likes. I have invested in other stocks that have one time "lump revenues" and that is not usually rewarded as well by Wall Street.
So when white label deals are announced, the skeptics say it is fluff. We know it is at least $300K annual revenue and that is the very bottom end, so everyone can make whatever estimate they want for a given deal. Probably also a factor is the size of the MLM operation and how many people doing sales for it.
(7)
(0)