Quote Wit those numbers we should have been easy
Post# of 40991
(Total Views: 449)
Posted On: 05/20/2019 2:00:19 PM
Quote
Wit those numbers we should have been easy over .02. Look at other OTC stocks with no revenue or little. PPS is much, much higher.
Pps tanked, because he didn't give any verifiable proof to his claim so far. His time frames were way off again and again. Read the posts on i*hub. If you were a new investor looking for an opportunity to invest, do you invest your money on onci reading those negative posts 24/7? Why that many negative posts flourished over there for years? That's because of Steve Berman's lack of understanding about penny stock. Unfortunately, penny stock investors read that site. Hence, pps tanked initially. Now, later dilution killed this stock. Other fluff penny stocks ceo release news to pump their stock effectively and pps are higher.
But, good news is with one big proof onci still has potential to reach all time high. Although I am currently nervous, I still have a confidence here, hence, I am still here. Hoping for the best, imho.
Wit those numbers we should have been easy over .02. Look at other OTC stocks with no revenue or little. PPS is much, much higher.
Pps tanked, because he didn't give any verifiable proof to his claim so far. His time frames were way off again and again. Read the posts on i*hub. If you were a new investor looking for an opportunity to invest, do you invest your money on onci reading those negative posts 24/7? Why that many negative posts flourished over there for years? That's because of Steve Berman's lack of understanding about penny stock. Unfortunately, penny stock investors read that site. Hence, pps tanked initially. Now, later dilution killed this stock. Other fluff penny stocks ceo release news to pump their stock effectively and pps are higher.
But, good news is with one big proof onci still has potential to reach all time high. Although I am currently nervous, I still have a confidence here, hence, I am still here. Hoping for the best, imho.
(1)
(0)