It's absolutely reprehensible how posters who come
Post# of 72451
(Total Views: 405)
Posted On: 05/12/2019 11:50:51 AM
It's absolutely reprehensible how posters who come over from lieHUB are impugning the integrity of the CEO with absurd lies, in some cases lies that were de-bunked months ago, and then also try to make claims about what other people supposedly stated as fact -- which they did not.
Does anyone really think that Leo Ehrlich has the resources and connections with market makers to run the stock up to .42? Does anyone think that he would take a chance on going to the slammer for such a gross and obvious stock manipulation scheme? It is utterly absurd to think that he was behind millions of shares trading.
This is clearly a move aimed at directing people's attention away from the fact that there WAS some manipulation by traders' gangs (which includes hedge funds) which may or may not have been triggered by something that they may have learned. I never stated as fact, only as speculation, that there might have been a leak, as there has been before with this stock (as evidenced by trading BEFORE news hit), and as has been plainly seen in many other stocks. I never stated this as fact, despite the LIES that multi-identities are posting.
They are repeating these lies because when lies are repeated enough times, suckers start believing them.
We're not going to believe the lies some are posting here.
And libel is certainly a TOS violation. The libelous lies that people have posted about this CEO -- for the protection of the Hangout's legal liability -- will be deleted.
Does anyone really think that Leo Ehrlich has the resources and connections with market makers to run the stock up to .42? Does anyone think that he would take a chance on going to the slammer for such a gross and obvious stock manipulation scheme? It is utterly absurd to think that he was behind millions of shares trading.
This is clearly a move aimed at directing people's attention away from the fact that there WAS some manipulation by traders' gangs (which includes hedge funds) which may or may not have been triggered by something that they may have learned. I never stated as fact, only as speculation, that there might have been a leak, as there has been before with this stock (as evidenced by trading BEFORE news hit), and as has been plainly seen in many other stocks. I never stated this as fact, despite the LIES that multi-identities are posting.
They are repeating these lies because when lies are repeated enough times, suckers start believing them.
We're not going to believe the lies some are posting here.
And libel is certainly a TOS violation. The libelous lies that people have posted about this CEO -- for the protection of the Hangout's legal liability -- will be deleted.
(3)
(0)