Copy of a post I made on iHub slapping down the ba
Post# of 2306
(Total Views: 499)
Posted On: 04/25/2019 12:12:47 PM
Copy of a post I made on iHub slapping down the basher moron ALL-IN888:
Debunking amateur nonsense noted.
Aircraft recently operated by the Royal Air Force are not "old pos".
Anyone who actually bothered to read the authoritative brief on this topic would know that the majority of military tankers in the world are currently 64 to 54 years old and are going to be 90 to 100 years old before they are retired.
They would also know that the US DoD has a huge problem replacing its legacy Cold War tanker fleet even by the 100-year life point - on the grounds of incorrect decisions made in the past - particularly 11 years ago - affordability and aircraft availability.
Military aerospace professionals and industry commentators alike both agree that there will be increasing use made of contracted out military air-to-air refueling - as proven by the successful business model in the UK where the #1 worldwide contractor Airtanker provides the entire Royal Air Force capability with 14 aircraft on a $16.5 Billion contract for 27 years.
TMPS recently became the #2 contractor worldwide with the award of the US DoD contract for $121M over 5 years. The US DoD doesn't award competitive contracts - with multiple bidders - to a company unless satisfied that it can fulfill the requirement in the required timescale.
It is also deliberately misleading and an attempt at manipulation - which has been documented - to claim that $TMPS wil "tank hard back to .0300" - it was trading primarily in the .1000 to .1500 range even when an amateur trading forum was infested with naysayers / scammers trying to get cheap shares for several months last year.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=148347766
https://dod.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contra...cle/181837
Debunking amateur nonsense noted.
Aircraft recently operated by the Royal Air Force are not "old pos".
Anyone who actually bothered to read the authoritative brief on this topic would know that the majority of military tankers in the world are currently 64 to 54 years old and are going to be 90 to 100 years old before they are retired.
They would also know that the US DoD has a huge problem replacing its legacy Cold War tanker fleet even by the 100-year life point - on the grounds of incorrect decisions made in the past - particularly 11 years ago - affordability and aircraft availability.
Military aerospace professionals and industry commentators alike both agree that there will be increasing use made of contracted out military air-to-air refueling - as proven by the successful business model in the UK where the #1 worldwide contractor Airtanker provides the entire Royal Air Force capability with 14 aircraft on a $16.5 Billion contract for 27 years.
TMPS recently became the #2 contractor worldwide with the award of the US DoD contract for $121M over 5 years. The US DoD doesn't award competitive contracts - with multiple bidders - to a company unless satisfied that it can fulfill the requirement in the required timescale.
It is also deliberately misleading and an attempt at manipulation - which has been documented - to claim that $TMPS wil "tank hard back to .0300" - it was trading primarily in the .1000 to .1500 range even when an amateur trading forum was infested with naysayers / scammers trying to get cheap shares for several months last year.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_ms...=148347766
https://dod.defense.gov/News/Contracts/Contra...cle/181837
(2)
(0)Tempus Applied Solutions Holdings, Inc. (TMPS) Stock Research Links
"Per Ardua Ad Astra" - "Through Adversity To The Stars"
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.