The attorney letter with "Joseph Earle" proves fou
Post# of 40991
(Total Views: 263)
Posted On: 04/23/2019 8:16:10 PM
The attorney letter with "Joseph Earle" proves four things:
1) the attorney didn't proof read his own letter so how can anyone believe he actually reviewed all the prior disclosures from the company?
2) Steve Berman HIMSELF (or Alan Bailey for that matter) didn't even proofread the letter. He certainly would have noticed that his name was not listed.
3) Another 315 million shares were diluted into the O/S count from 1/31/19.
4) How come the original letter is dated April 23, 2019? SB said he mailed it in on April 18. Is he now directing the lawyer to post date letters?
4,647,267,244 as of date: January 31, 2019
4,962,504,870 shares as of April 23, 2019
I see a corrected version as now been posted with Berman's name along with our virtual CFO Bailey.
1) the attorney didn't proof read his own letter so how can anyone believe he actually reviewed all the prior disclosures from the company?
2) Steve Berman HIMSELF (or Alan Bailey for that matter) didn't even proofread the letter. He certainly would have noticed that his name was not listed.
3) Another 315 million shares were diluted into the O/S count from 1/31/19.
4) How come the original letter is dated April 23, 2019? SB said he mailed it in on April 18. Is he now directing the lawyer to post date letters?
4,647,267,244 as of date: January 31, 2019
4,962,504,870 shares as of April 23, 2019
I see a corrected version as now been posted with Berman's name along with our virtual CFO Bailey.
(2)
(0)