Indeed it is and likely has to do with shares, wha
Post# of 40991
(Total Views: 576)
Posted On: 04/18/2019 2:00:57 PM
Indeed it is and likely has to do with shares, what was being done to them and how they were handled in 2018... and why are both attorneys on the list, hmm...
While we await what may turn up on this last day of this trading week... here's some reading material... yes of course aimo:
Furthermore to what I posted and on a side note, why does an OTC CEO keep putting out information of things to happen which don't necessarily materialize? Well, for one, a start-up in OTC is there to raise money... period!
It's what most all, especially pinky, OTC CEOs do... PR and promote to create volume so their lenders (usually 'toxic' fund providers) can sell the shares they bought in deals...
So for nearly two years he worked on gaining shareholder growth to garner their trust, support, confidence and allegiance (might as well add money) but then brought on toxic lenders and now it's all faltering ... he needs to keep providing information to keep shareholders involved and buying so that he can help his lenders get their funds back (plus plenty more)... maybe he's finally being questioned by some 'authority' that he has cut back on saying much of anything... meanwhile, shareholders have been and are losing trust and need to see proof... I, for one, have always wanted to see third party proof.
Unfortunately, he's become the normal OTC CEO... maybe the tragedy is he knows that he can get what he wants, with no real requirements to file and could care less what happens to his shareholders... actually I do hope there's some 'authority' questioning him... whether regulatory or other (customer, colleague, board member, large investor, attorney, etc.).
To me, there must be a huge problem in getting that seemingly simple attorney letter (which backs up the 2018 annual financial filing) to remove that yield sign... tsk tsk.
That last 4/8 tweet now has 34 replies... let's see if he responds to anyone... ahahah
https://twitter.com/on4company/status/1115208264722128896
Very best to all with ONCI/HEXA !
While we await what may turn up on this last day of this trading week... here's some reading material... yes of course aimo:
Furthermore to what I posted and on a side note, why does an OTC CEO keep putting out information of things to happen which don't necessarily materialize? Well, for one, a start-up in OTC is there to raise money... period!
It's what most all, especially pinky, OTC CEOs do... PR and promote to create volume so their lenders (usually 'toxic' fund providers) can sell the shares they bought in deals...
So for nearly two years he worked on gaining shareholder growth to garner their trust, support, confidence and allegiance (might as well add money) but then brought on toxic lenders and now it's all faltering ... he needs to keep providing information to keep shareholders involved and buying so that he can help his lenders get their funds back (plus plenty more)... maybe he's finally being questioned by some 'authority' that he has cut back on saying much of anything... meanwhile, shareholders have been and are losing trust and need to see proof... I, for one, have always wanted to see third party proof.
Unfortunately, he's become the normal OTC CEO... maybe the tragedy is he knows that he can get what he wants, with no real requirements to file and could care less what happens to his shareholders... actually I do hope there's some 'authority' questioning him... whether regulatory or other (customer, colleague, board member, large investor, attorney, etc.).
To me, there must be a huge problem in getting that seemingly simple attorney letter (which backs up the 2018 annual financial filing) to remove that yield sign... tsk tsk.
That last 4/8 tweet now has 34 replies... let's see if he responds to anyone... ahahah
https://twitter.com/on4company/status/1115208264722128896
Very best to all with ONCI/HEXA !
(2)
(0)