VASCO SUIT DROPPED Whats the next Surprise ?

VASCO SUIT DROPPED

Whats the next Surprise ?


STRIKEFORCE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
VASCO DATA SECURITY INTERNATIONAL, INC. and VASCO DATA SECURITY, INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-10423-RGS
JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

1:17-cv-10423-RGS Document 65 Filed 04/15/19 Page 2 of 4
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Strikeforce
Technologies, Inc. (“Strikeforce”) and Defendants OneSpan, Inc. (formerly VASCO Data
Security International, Inc.) and OneSpan North America, Inc. (formerly Vasco Data Security,
Inc.) (collectively, “Defendants”) have stipulated that (1) all claims brought or that could have
been brought in this action by the StrikeForce are dismissed with prejudice; and (2) all defenses
and counterclaims brought or that could have been brought in this action by the Defendants are
dismissed without prejudice.
StrikeForce has further stipulated that Strikeforce, on behalf of itself and any successors-
in-interest to U.S. Patent 8,484,698 (“the ’698 patent”) and U.S. Patent 8,713,701 (“the ’701
patent”) (collectively, “the Asserted Patents”), hereby unconditionally and irrevocably covenants
not to assert at any time any claim of patent infringement including direct infringement,
contributory infringement and/or inducing infringement against Defendants and/or any of their
parents, subsidiaries, successors-in-interest, customers, or end users, under any claim of the
Asserted Patents, any parents of the Asserted Patents, or any continuations, continuations-in-part,
divisionals, reexaminations, reissues, certificates and foreign counterparts to the Asserted Patents
or parents of the Asserted Patents.
Based on the foregoing stipulations, StrikeForce and Defendants jointly move for an
order dismissing this action with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs, expenses and attorneys fees.