The main problem you’re having is my problem too

Quote:

---

The main problem you’re having is my problem too. What makes it worse though is NP stating he’s fully aware of it and he is feeling our pain. “Promises” non dilutive financing, but giving us the same old Paulson recipe. Every single thing the man says has to be doubted and this is what the share price is telling us.

Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/viewall?id=...z5kpY3Z5u8

---

This is my opinion, referring to your post on Ihub that people should read ihub for talk about NP and here about science for balance.

NP is not discussed here much, as opposed to ihub, really because everyone has said their piece, and knows the situation.

For example, I know Lawman content of his next post, it is going to include they should replace NP, that he is overpaid, that he has not bought stock, that he can't understand him, that his timelines are never right, he always over-promises. Does he really need to post it again and again and again and again? Maybe they should make a list and pin it to the top, but then no one would have anything else to say over there. It adds nothing new after he has posted the same message 200 times. Not attacking you, this is the first NP post I remember from you, just giving my opinion on the ihub relevance question.

I am fine with Lawman overall though, I know he is long. I know he is frustrated and not trying to manipulate the share price. I know you are long and frustrated and are not trying to manipulate the share price. You have given both positives and negatives, that is completely fine here. That goes a long way in my book. Just as long as we don't make predictions, like going to 30c, etc and stick to valid and correct information like you did. Yes it is frustrating that NP has repeatedly said they are close for months now to continue to use Paulson. Maybe they have been close to a deal or maybe he knew the deal would take months and if he said the full truth, well guys, we are going to have to use paulson to raise another $30M, the share price would take a massive hit.


There are some great longs posting good info, saltz for example only posts there. There are others on ihub that are not long though. They feed off the frustration to try and manipulate the share price for their financial gain. They pretend, and they mislead, they are wolves hiding among the frustrated shareholders. Notice those don't show up here posting.. but ihub gives them a voice, which I dislike greatly.