Ted, I am making an assumption based on the PR, th
Post# of 22465
(Total Views: 605)
Posted On: 04/11/2019 1:16:51 PM
Ted, I am making an assumption based on the PR, the year of testing w/o measurable degradation and the fact that a display was modified to demonstrate the operation of the perovskite QD LEDs in a display for OEMs in San Marcos.
All the technology exists for QMCs new QDLED Commercialization in existing LED Factories. The all-important difference is the QD lens or cap. it's a drop-in solution. Any LED OEM can license and do it. Actually, a QDLED OEM is necessary to supply QDLED to Display makers. We'll see.
Re Solid-state lighting the same QDLED for display can be adopted and adjusted for lighting. If ready for one then ready for the other. Obviously, SSL can wait a little longer because priority is displays and starting up QDSC Factory, but it won't be long because R&D is done.
So I am not apologizing for reading into known facts, but they are there for everyone to see and draw their own conclusions if they don't like mine.
All the technology exists for QMCs new QDLED Commercialization in existing LED Factories. The all-important difference is the QD lens or cap. it's a drop-in solution. Any LED OEM can license and do it. Actually, a QDLED OEM is necessary to supply QDLED to Display makers. We'll see.
Re Solid-state lighting the same QDLED for display can be adopted and adjusted for lighting. If ready for one then ready for the other. Obviously, SSL can wait a little longer because priority is displays and starting up QDSC Factory, but it won't be long because R&D is done.
So I am not apologizing for reading into known facts, but they are there for everyone to see and draw their own conclusions if they don't like mine.
(0)
(0)