I believe what confused some investors is that in
Post# of 75001
This was three days after podcast #22 on March 26. Of course, the split never happened and currently is a week past that(in a week) timeframe. That's why I stated in one post that it's never a good idea to fixate on one date, as seldom do things happen when they are scheduled to happen.
So now the stance is that it happens when it happens. Although many of us realize that this is usually the case, many investors take what he says to be chiseled in stone for some reason.
Probably best that in the future Michael never mentions a date of any kind for something to transpire. He should just say, it will happen when it will happen if there is something pending. That way nobody can get upset about a missed date.
A good example is May 1ST. The date Mexico should once again open it's doors to CBD products to cross the border. If nothing else, we should've learned by now that most likely nothing will happen on May 1. Most likely a week or several weeks later. We shall know soon enough.
What's the big deal anyway? If someone is truly a long waiting a few extra days or weeks or even months is nothing to obsess about. It's to be expected with new companies that the going is not always smooth. It's for each investor to determine if the wait is worthwhile or not.