PP....If you want to quote ME....(as opposed to an

PP....If you want to quote ME....(as opposed to an anonymous poster...which is also your line of BS) it best not be taken out of context to tickle your agenda.

Quote:

---

Seriously... Heddle could PR that The process has been recently patented in Canada, under final review in the States, and is currently being considered by a number of companies both in Canada and the States...and that very well might be enough to put a choke hold on these nasty manipulators. The reality is that the patented process isn't a hoax or a scam...neither is the machine...and the only point of a PR that may be considered a "pump" is the companies that may or may not be looking into the process...only because Heddle has been keeping things "mum" on the shareholder communications...ie...it could very well be true. If I were in his shoes, I'd be doing the same thing...he's got plenty invested in this...and would probably love to see an appreciation of his holdings through a number of PR's and updates...only a matter of time.. hold 'em!!

GL PTOI'rs

---

So as you can clearly see....my post addresses my attitude towards a PR...or the conditions regarding it. So...take all your BS nonsense...and go write a column on ...oh....I don't know.....the complexities of being an anal retentive adolescent...from which you could most probably incorporate first hand experience into your elaborate memoirs.