Very untrue statements you put out there, Pluto.
Your "discussions" are always directed by you and for you. If anyone questions your statements or the company's statements, you attack the one who posts the questions while labeling the poster in a negative manner.
The "discussion" is not "all about stock price"; that is your assumption and stand.
The discussion is about the truth.
There are many readers who will not post, afraid if they voice their concerns they will be cut off from any and all company "tidbits" issued by you. Many times you have threatened to leave, taking with you the source of company "information", yet, where has this "information" benefited them? All it does is leave them with a modicum of hope in a failing investment. Prove me wrong by tracking your postings and the movement of this stock, DECN.
I believe "Jonesing" for a DECN information fix would be the appropriate metaphor to apply here. So many are holding out for a glimmer of hope in their DECN investment.
You provide interesting information that could be considered valuable, if the information ever proves to be factual and positive, but when you do so, it is always laced with vindictive attacks at others who have disagreed with you in the present and in the past. If you would leave out the attacks, your posts would survive and there would be no problem.
As far as the "typos", this is an old subject and has not been brought up recently. There seems to be more diligent attention paid to this consistent problem in the past, so the attention paid to the errors resulted in a positive reaction by management, obviously.
You write:
"The MOMENT we had real discussion based on an uninformed but honest question, the extinguishment of discussion started. Typos and disclosures became the face of the company. A ridiculous notion."
I fail to see that moment. All I saw were attacks. Typos were not even mentioned (why do you keep bringing up a non-current problem with the company reports?)
If you wish to enter into worthwhile discussion, please, by all means, do so
BUT
when you commence attacking anyone or any group in the body of your "discussions" your "discussions" will not be allowed.
Do you think you can inter into "discussions" without attacking someone... anyone?
Please prove me wrong. I would embrace the opportunity for worthwhile, pleasant "discussions".
Your "discussions" are always directed by you and for you. If anyone questions your statements or the company's statements, you attack the one who posts the questions while labeling the poster in a negative manner.
The "discussion" is not "all about stock price"; that is your assumption and stand.
The discussion is about the truth.
There are many readers who will not post, afraid if they voice their concerns they will be cut off from any and all company "tidbits" issued by you. Many times you have threatened to leave, taking with you the source of company "information", yet, where has this "information" benefited them? All it does is leave them with a modicum of hope in a failing investment. Prove me wrong by tracking your postings and the movement of this stock, DECN.
I believe "Jonesing" for a DECN information fix would be the appropriate metaphor to apply here. So many are holding out for a glimmer of hope in their DECN investment.
You provide interesting information that could be considered valuable, if the information ever proves to be factual and positive, but when you do so, it is always laced with vindictive attacks at others who have disagreed with you in the present and in the past. If you would leave out the attacks, your posts would survive and there would be no problem.
As far as the "typos", this is an old subject and has not been brought up recently. There seems to be more diligent attention paid to this consistent problem in the past, so the attention paid to the errors resulted in a positive reaction by management, obviously.
You write:
"The MOMENT we had real discussion based on an uninformed but honest question, the extinguishment of discussion started. Typos and disclosures became the face of the company. A ridiculous notion."
I fail to see that moment. All I saw were attacks. Typos were not even mentioned (why do you keep bringing up a non-current problem with the company reports?)
If you wish to enter into worthwhile discussion, please, by all means, do so
BUT
when you commence attacking anyone or any group in the body of your "discussions" your "discussions" will not be allowed.
Do you think you can inter into "discussions" without attacking someone... anyone?
Please prove me wrong. I would embrace the opportunity for worthwhile, pleasant "discussions".
2
