Bruce, In the past I've held IMGN at times when
Post# of 15624
In the past I've held IMGN at times when it only had sufficient funding to operate for roughly a month, but they knew a partnership was coming. What they did was unusual, and I believe most companies want to maintain sufficient funding for at least an additional year. In that you're saying the $3.5 million the company has will take them essentially one year, I believe it would be fair to say if they raised $5 million more they should have funds for a second year or more.
I'm of the belief that if they said they were abandoning the reverse split until at least next year, the price would return to at least a dime within a matter of weeks. At a dime, 50 million shares would raise $5 million. I would certainly prefer the O/S going up by 50M shares and avoid an R/S rather than having our holdings reduced by at least 1 for 100, and probably more.
As for holding or selling, I'm like many others here, I have a substantial loss, but still have a belief in what the company is trying to do. I'm willing to let it run it's course.
Gary