Posted the below to the other board just now simpl
Post# of 72446
(Total Views: 440)
Posted On: 03/30/2019 4:48:11 PM
Posted the below to the other board just now simply to tick off the FUDsters.
The following example is about as likely to happen as IPIX closing its doors 1 April due to lack of funds since someone holding a thing of great value can ALWAYS find somebody willing to lend them money (albeit sometimes at a hefty price tag)as long as they have the asset, especially when all he needs is a minuscule amount compared to the value of the asset.
Keep in mind Leo doesn't have to tell anyone if or where he gets the money in Q1 until the quarterly report due May 10 or so.
An heir in West Texas is left a very large ranch by a relative and he has absolutely no interest in keeping it. He puts it up for sale and while negotiations are in progress, he has to pay monthly costs for various fixed expenses. He doesn't have the funds for these expenses so what is he to do?
Many here, comparing the ranch to IPIX, say he should walk away and forget he ever owned the ranch, giving it to the state or some charity.
Does that sound logical when it is apparent the ranch can be used for massive leasing for wind power farms, leasing to hunters for deer hunting, leasing for cattle grazing, prior studies have shown that massive oil and gas reserves may be on the property, water is on the ranch and lots of acreage could be used for agricultural purposes, and probably a handful of other revenue streams? Of course not, and this is how BPs have to look at the revenue potential of both Brilacidin and Kevetrin.
Now instead of an heir that has no emotional or financial attachment to the ranch, the owner is a young man that grew up on the ranch and worked it for many years while trying to convince his relative who owned the property to commercialize its many revenue streams - how hard would that owner work to see the property is not sold but money is raised so he could bring it to its full value? This is how I view Leo and IPIX - it is not simply a job, it is his life's work and the phase of his life that will show if he was a success or a failure. IMO he will turn over every last stone to make things work and that is just what Leo is doing. His progress has been steady and now is just about to the point where his efforts finally will be rewarded. Those cheering for him, who have only had dark times up until now, finally see the light and those trying to screw the ranch from him are now seeing that their plots and deceits are going to bite them in the ass big time.
Leo, and thus IPIX, is not going away come 1 April as he knows where to get funds and most likely has already done so. Keep quiet Leo regarding your plans until the EMA meeting, the acceptance of the P3 protocol by FDA/EMA, and the announcement of a partnership for OM loaded with upfront monies which all should come very, very soon.
The ranch in Texas is going nowhere and neither are Leo or IPIX. They are here to stay.
The following example is about as likely to happen as IPIX closing its doors 1 April due to lack of funds since someone holding a thing of great value can ALWAYS find somebody willing to lend them money (albeit sometimes at a hefty price tag)as long as they have the asset, especially when all he needs is a minuscule amount compared to the value of the asset.
Keep in mind Leo doesn't have to tell anyone if or where he gets the money in Q1 until the quarterly report due May 10 or so.
An heir in West Texas is left a very large ranch by a relative and he has absolutely no interest in keeping it. He puts it up for sale and while negotiations are in progress, he has to pay monthly costs for various fixed expenses. He doesn't have the funds for these expenses so what is he to do?
Many here, comparing the ranch to IPIX, say he should walk away and forget he ever owned the ranch, giving it to the state or some charity.
Does that sound logical when it is apparent the ranch can be used for massive leasing for wind power farms, leasing to hunters for deer hunting, leasing for cattle grazing, prior studies have shown that massive oil and gas reserves may be on the property, water is on the ranch and lots of acreage could be used for agricultural purposes, and probably a handful of other revenue streams? Of course not, and this is how BPs have to look at the revenue potential of both Brilacidin and Kevetrin.
Now instead of an heir that has no emotional or financial attachment to the ranch, the owner is a young man that grew up on the ranch and worked it for many years while trying to convince his relative who owned the property to commercialize its many revenue streams - how hard would that owner work to see the property is not sold but money is raised so he could bring it to its full value? This is how I view Leo and IPIX - it is not simply a job, it is his life's work and the phase of his life that will show if he was a success or a failure. IMO he will turn over every last stone to make things work and that is just what Leo is doing. His progress has been steady and now is just about to the point where his efforts finally will be rewarded. Those cheering for him, who have only had dark times up until now, finally see the light and those trying to screw the ranch from him are now seeing that their plots and deceits are going to bite them in the ass big time.
Leo, and thus IPIX, is not going away come 1 April as he knows where to get funds and most likely has already done so. Keep quiet Leo regarding your plans until the EMA meeting, the acceptance of the P3 protocol by FDA/EMA, and the announcement of a partnership for OM loaded with upfront monies which all should come very, very soon.
The ranch in Texas is going nowhere and neither are Leo or IPIX. They are here to stay.
(12)
(0)