btw .. i'm sure it's just a coincidence .. ;) .. t
Post# of 72447
(Total Views: 188)
Posted On: 03/27/2019 10:03:28 AM
btw .. i'm sure it's just a coincidence .. 
.. that on Monday MM Paul was relegated to the 4th position on *ask* .. and yesterday and currently so far today .. 3rd
note volume avgs .. all that effort expended by NR for *decreasing* avgs ..
and it's why i can note they are failing .. remember the easiest aspect NR can *control* is an OTC PPS
IPIX Volume 81,000
Volume (10 day Average) 298,067
Volume (90 day Average) 480,190
here's IPIX volume avgs @ COM on 3.1.19 .. which kicked off reporting below
i suspect it's actually far worse than what is being *reported* .. perhaps just me
IPIX Volume 355,785
Volume (10 day Average) 539,882
Volume (90 day Average) 589,009
4kids
no you file to Finra because it's NR (non retail)
.. the MMs' .. who are reporting this *factually incorrect* data to Finra
Finra *relies* on NR to be *correct* in their *reporting*
that is why i noted (because i do track my investments)
when there was a significant discrepancy on another OTC target
that also remains a 10 year *survivor* .. (i called Finra directly)
it was corrected (discrepancy) .. but it took a few weeks to do so
http://www.finra.org/investors/investor-complaint-center
4kids
.. that on Monday MM Paul was relegated to the 4th position on *ask* .. and yesterday and currently so far today .. 3rd note volume avgs .. all that effort expended by NR for *decreasing* avgs ..
and it's why i can note they are failing .. remember the easiest aspect NR can *control* is an OTC PPS
IPIX Volume 81,000
Volume (10 day Average) 298,067
Volume (90 day Average) 480,190
here's IPIX volume avgs @ COM on 3.1.19 .. which kicked off reporting below
i suspect it's actually far worse than what is being *reported* .. perhaps just me
IPIX Volume 355,785
Volume (10 day Average) 539,882
Volume (90 day Average) 589,009
Mar 26 NA NA NA 308,758 176,415 57.14%
Mar 25 NA NA NA 278,978 163,789 58.71%
Mar 22 NA NA NA 158,555 113,214 71.40%
Mar 21 NA NA NA 315,535 156,683 49.66%
Mar 20 NA NA NA 249,484 167,488 67.13%
Mar 19 NA NA NA 376,201 287,179 76.34%
Mar 18 NA NA NA 233,929 199,632 85.34%
Mar 15 NA NA NA 410,580 292,135 71.15%
Mar 14 NA NA NA 264,241 210,400 79.62%
Mar 13 NA NA NA 384,406 295,944 76.99%
Mar 12 NA NA NA 278,799 227,807 81.71%
Mar 11 NA NA NA 359,435 254,248 70.74%
Mar 08 NA NA NA 219,203 146,016 66.61%
Mar 07 NA NA NA 226,552 213,443 94.21%
Mar 06 NA NA NA 466,807 368,784 79.00%
Mar 05 NA NA NA 371,973 258,296 69.44%
Mar 04 NA NA NA 475,644 301,557 63.40%
Mar 01 NA NA NA 355,785 301,825 84.83%
4kids
no you file to Finra because it's NR (non retail)
.. the MMs' .. who are reporting this *factually incorrect* data to Finra
Finra *relies* on NR to be *correct* in their *reporting*
that is why i noted (because i do track my investments)
when there was a significant discrepancy on another OTC target
that also remains a 10 year *survivor* .. (i called Finra directly)
it was corrected (discrepancy) .. but it took a few weeks to do so
http://www.finra.org/investors/investor-complaint-center
4kids
(1)
(0)