We've gotten pretty good at spotting soft bashers
Post# of 72446
(Total Views: 297)
Posted On: 03/26/2019 4:20:52 PM
We've gotten pretty good at spotting soft bashers here.
For instance, posts like this, predicting doom and gloom, and then saying "but I'm not a basher" by ending with a positive note:
Or one like this: "I'm a real shareholder and I will buy when the stock is killed"
Then, there's the little matter of defending a basher identity that wrote something inaccurate, then said that he/she/it was referring to a different drug entirely, and that "anyone" should know magically what was meant (even though that premise was wrong too). This is just silly -- makes a person wonder why someone gets all defensive about a post that a supposedly different person wrote, that no one else understood because it was wrong.
Anyone can be wrong sometimes, but continuing to hammer an inaccurate claim made on lieHUB -- hmmmm
Now that one was a masterpiece of soft-bashing. "EMA is typically more stringent" (no) -- "The EMA will be the true test" (spreading fear that the EMA won't approve, when in fact they are LESS stringent)
And speaking of masterpieces -- move along, no soft-bashing here to look at:
need I comment on this one?
These are just from the more recent posts. I didn't feel like wasting time going back further.
Now why would anyone view this as soft-bashing?
I know why.
For instance, posts like this, predicting doom and gloom, and then saying "but I'm not a basher" by ending with a positive note:
Quote:
Stock price will steadily decline until funding is cleared up. A deal is likely sooner or later. There is no good alternative to move forward. Leo will get it done.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=537...z5jJGh5LqE
Or one like this: "I'm a real shareholder and I will buy when the stock is killed"
Quote:
Holding a bit of cash for some volatility toward the end of next week. Looking for new lows on a NR and uncertainty. Nickel shares will be a great story
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?
If I can add another 100K@0.05 great.
id=5382650#ixzz5jJHDOsO6
How can we use this information against them and get the best price? 0.06? 0.05?
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=538...z5jJHzxzs6
I'll take 100K at $0.06. Brass balls here are where fortunes and legendary investment stories are made.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=539...z5jJKOiTrS
Then, there's the little matter of defending a basher identity that wrote something inaccurate, then said that he/she/it was referring to a different drug entirely, and that "anyone" should know magically what was meant (even though that premise was wrong too). This is just silly -- makes a person wonder why someone gets all defensive about a post that a supposedly different person wrote, that no one else understood because it was wrong.
Quote:
He was talking about the interval/frequency of the Cisplatin dosing - the only thing different about the two non-placebo B-OM arms. I think it was very clear to anyone who understands the B-OM trial.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=538...z5jJII7N5X
Anyone can be wrong sometimes, but continuing to hammer an inaccurate claim made on lieHUB -- hmmmm
Quote:
The EMA is typically more stringent than the FDA. Europe in general has higher safety standards for food/drug products than the US. If we get a protocol ironed out with the EMA, it will almost certainly be good enough for the FDA.
That's why all this nonsense about Leo going to Europe because the FDA is giving him a hard time is bunk. The EMA will be the true test.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=538...z5jJIyGgOh
Now that one was a masterpiece of soft-bashing. "EMA is typically more stringent" (no) -- "The EMA will be the true test" (spreading fear that the EMA won't approve, when in fact they are LESS stringent)
And speaking of masterpieces -- move along, no soft-bashing here to look at:
Quote:
My question is why $0.10-$0.14? We have been here for months. Why have they not finished us off with another hit piece. Why have they not committed another $600,000 to short another 5,000,000+ shares? They could drive this to subpenny if they wanted to.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=538...z5jJJQBSEb
need I comment on this one?
Quote:
No. Only an appropriate pipeline development deal can cure what ails IPIX and have any chance of getting all shareholders into the green.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=539...z5jJJtXN48
These are just from the more recent posts. I didn't feel like wasting time going back further.
Now why would anyone view this as soft-bashing?
I know why.
(5)
(0)