Would like to see the Letter to Shareholders relea
Post# of 40991
(Total Views: 368)
Posted On: 03/25/2019 10:42:25 PM
Would like to see the Letter to Shareholders released before market open.
Publishing the Letter after hours will feed into the negative comments made on the other Board.
At the end of today we had momentum in our favor. Tremendous bid support at .012, and yet we closed at .0014.
I might be expecting too much in the Letter; however, Steve has to give us names. I realize the consequences, but I don't believe he has much choice. We have stood by him with his wrangling to give information without verifiable names. It is time. Let the chips fall where they may. I am sure he has advised any NAMED client to be on the look out for an avalanche of phone calls, but this is part and parcel of a DEAL.
We can't go on un-named clients. Our $2.88 million client MUST be named. Perhaps not who is testing in Detroit and Charlotte.
Also, my guess is we landed the roofing company contract, even if for not all the 1,200 trucks. Another name!
Now, when it comes to the 450 million deal at .0024, we also need a name. Or, if no one is buying those shares, where the money is going. Did we get a license for Sifthouse? Talking about Sifthouse, we need an update. He cannot ignore this potential MJ deal.
So, you all can tell I am frustrated and pretty demanding; however, my average share price is .0035 and above, as I did not have the resources to average down. I want answers!
If Steve appreciates his long shareholders who have stood by him through all the mis-steps and disasters, he can reward them now by being OPEN and HONEST.
Okay, I had my say. Just my opinion. Thanks.
P.S. It's easier to write a post after a few scotchontherocks.
Publishing the Letter after hours will feed into the negative comments made on the other Board.
At the end of today we had momentum in our favor. Tremendous bid support at .012, and yet we closed at .0014.
I might be expecting too much in the Letter; however, Steve has to give us names. I realize the consequences, but I don't believe he has much choice. We have stood by him with his wrangling to give information without verifiable names. It is time. Let the chips fall where they may. I am sure he has advised any NAMED client to be on the look out for an avalanche of phone calls, but this is part and parcel of a DEAL.
We can't go on un-named clients. Our $2.88 million client MUST be named. Perhaps not who is testing in Detroit and Charlotte.
Also, my guess is we landed the roofing company contract, even if for not all the 1,200 trucks. Another name!
Now, when it comes to the 450 million deal at .0024, we also need a name. Or, if no one is buying those shares, where the money is going. Did we get a license for Sifthouse? Talking about Sifthouse, we need an update. He cannot ignore this potential MJ deal.
So, you all can tell I am frustrated and pretty demanding; however, my average share price is .0035 and above, as I did not have the resources to average down. I want answers!
If Steve appreciates his long shareholders who have stood by him through all the mis-steps and disasters, he can reward them now by being OPEN and HONEST.
Okay, I had my say. Just my opinion. Thanks.
P.S. It's easier to write a post after a few scotchontherocks.
(5)
(0)On4 Communications (ONCI) Stock Research Links
Sometimes sh*t happens!