Thanks for the response DDawg and toodles. I agree
Post# of 40991
(Total Views: 257)
Posted On: 03/24/2019 6:27:19 PM
Thanks for the response DDawg and toodles. I agree we need an audit. Not only to quiet the other board down some, but because it’s past time to file one.
Over the past 3 years Berman has mentioned he wanted to do an audit. We thought this time last year we were going to get one but do to circumstances it couldn’t be done. In the January 31, 2018 shareholder letter, he stated “I take full responsibility as CEO of the company for not getting this done. We are working hard to get all this information together to get a complete audit done”. For that reason alone, I expect one to be done.
I’ve been hoping that no attorney letter meant there is an audit being done. If he files an audit the attorney letter is not needed. I believe some other form gets filed in its place though. May also be why he tweeted “bashers will be eating dirt oh so very soon”, or something like that. The excuse he tweeted for the reason of the yield sign made no sense.
I wouldn’t have felt so negative about the debt in Q1 if there weren’t so many other issues going unanswered or addressed. Yield sign, Hexagon and On4 Colorado noncompliant, at what stage are we at to becoming Hexagon Holdings, LG Capital vs. On4 unresolved after 27 months, what’s up with the million dollar 1-A, no name of 2nd private label, etc., etc., etc.
Over the past 3 years Berman has mentioned he wanted to do an audit. We thought this time last year we were going to get one but do to circumstances it couldn’t be done. In the January 31, 2018 shareholder letter, he stated “I take full responsibility as CEO of the company for not getting this done. We are working hard to get all this information together to get a complete audit done”. For that reason alone, I expect one to be done.
I’ve been hoping that no attorney letter meant there is an audit being done. If he files an audit the attorney letter is not needed. I believe some other form gets filed in its place though. May also be why he tweeted “bashers will be eating dirt oh so very soon”, or something like that. The excuse he tweeted for the reason of the yield sign made no sense.
I wouldn’t have felt so negative about the debt in Q1 if there weren’t so many other issues going unanswered or addressed. Yield sign, Hexagon and On4 Colorado noncompliant, at what stage are we at to becoming Hexagon Holdings, LG Capital vs. On4 unresolved after 27 months, what’s up with the million dollar 1-A, no name of 2nd private label, etc., etc., etc.
(1)
(0)