correlation and timing of *appearance* says it all

correlation and timing of *appearance* says it all

and it's not unique to this SMB

the whining can be read by all with interest
and has been duly noted

flat out falsehood posts get deleted here
there is a site that welcomes them .. it isn't this one

lastly the negative focus on PTOI's historical documentation
as being an issue gives every indication
of trolling .. look it up .. as noted recently .. i liked it better
when .. had me on ignore .. vs the pretense of it

disputing factual data for the sake of *posting* is trolling
and it is always telling to me (and some others) as to why

NR and trading crews .. have always targeted factual historical data
but never more so until February 2010 .. when the DRS % link (implemented
at the behest of the SEC) via Finra first went live

for months *there* (2010) .. this very subject was verboten and posts
showing the DRS % on specific *OTC targets* were removed as OT
realize few OTC targets .. survive let alone outlast NRs' *efforts*

so NR and trading crews needed *new* talking points .. because for years these
entities' posted that there was no such thing as shorting OTC stocks

coincidentally the author of PTOI's first hit piece spread this bogus bs at every turn

of course back then (due to P2O's actual investors vs those who trade and were loosely affiliated with the *original* trading crew embedded in P2O since 2009) the usual by rote working of a stock was to cycle up .. cycle back .. cycle up .. cycle back

with P2O's founder having actual investors (to this day many of whom have never sold one share) .. the by rote conditioning of certain *original* NR trading crews' posting on P2O's SMB .. had little effect .. which is why NR was so significantly upside down from the *hand off* of December 2009 into January 2010

by the EO December 2010 .. NR was significantly *stuck* (Upside Down) it's why in July of 2010 .. 2 separate *efforts* were undertaken by NR .. but the clutch move of September 2010 by NR was the set up for what would come to pass in 2011

in the meantime the founder of P2O .. would scale tech from table top to flagship in 4 years (2009 - 2013)

the easiest aspect NR controls on an OTC target is the PPS .. since 12/31/13 and 10/9/14 .. PTOI (the stock) has been held at or mostly below 10c and 5c respectively

again to point out what most can understand .. when investors actually sell .. volume increases .. it doesn't decrease

since P2O (the company) was wrested back in mid August 2013 .. PTOI's volume
has decreased YOY YTD .. with one exception .. 2018 .. PTOI had 13M and change go off .. slightly more (about 500,000 shares) than 2017's 13M and change

NR is beyond *stuck* on PTOI (the stock) .. NRs' MO is to always brutalize an UPSIDE DOWN OTC TARGET .. because it will always impact mgmt's ability to execute

over the coming days .. P2O will either file their annual (expense expended) or an NT indicating the intent by the company

or they won't

all the whining in the world on this board .. will not change what P2O's CEO & BoD
have scheduled

and no one here knows what is en route ..

the only aspect every *actual* P2O investor determines is whether they buy/sell or hold their PTOI *shares* .. (since it's clear by the always decreasing volume in play and what has had to be *marked* recently) it's equally clear that whomever tapped the *hidden* and non hidden volume of 1.29.19 .. it wasn't retail

so pointing out that PTOI's volume *imo* is being wash traded for volume maintenance

gets maligned consistently by *entities* .. most of whom are part of the original crew (both sides .. pro/con .. well covered .. there) embedded in P2O

so why exactly would that be .. it is crystal clear based on *volume* .. there are little to none news on P2O

and imo that will remain until the CEO & BoD .. actually give a reason for new eyes to enter .. which is as it should be

so it's not for new eyes ..

so ask yourself why the *crew* would have such an issue with historical/factual data re: PTOI?

it isn't rocket science .. but it is math

4kids