don't disagree .. but as previously noted re:
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 361)
Posted On: 03/18/2019 8:51:33 AM
don't disagree .. but as previously noted
re:
RH's entire pattern change out re: *silence* in December was notable
and as *i* previously noted .. why sell the blending site if *intent* was
to bring back flagship (and presumably workhorse #2) .. that scenario
did not (and does not) make sense .. other scenarios however imo *do*
PTOI is the stock .. P2O is the company .. the stock is not delinquent .. the company however is delinquent in holding an AGM (if memory serves .. AGM
is supposed to be held every 18 months) .. that said there is a cost to holding
an AGM .. as for expiration of CEO's notes payable and RC's investors' intent re: MA .. that is significant and why *i* have noted RH's pattern change out over the last 3 months .. RH has never not failed to *file* .. but December 2018 he did
so the ? becomes *why* then?
you and everyone else with interest can go back to 2014 and read my posts
specific to CEO's *less than stellar communication skill sets*
it is beyond frustrating .. that said i also recognize that PTOI (the stock) has been illegally manipulated since 2009 .. and because of said manipulation .. perhaps the CEO finally figured out .. the only route for P2O to take that NR can't relentlessly manipulate PTOI .. is to deliver a sequence of material events that can't be *reset* yet again
the point of my post .. is that all with interest will know what CEO's intent is *shortly*
.. because no one would expend the financial resources to file a K if the intent is to shutter P2O?
if the K isn't filed .. i would presume the worst
if the K is filed .. i would expect a long and detailed explanation to accompany filing
if the K is filed sans an update .. it tells me that timing is still in play specific to P2O's options
and yes *imo* contrary to *some* .. P2O (the company) has numerous options
some far more appealing to me than others ..
4kids
re:
Quote:
Last infusions were supposed to bring the processor back online, and yet here we sit with shuttered operations and crickets from the Management team......
RH's entire pattern change out re: *silence* in December was notable
and as *i* previously noted .. why sell the blending site if *intent* was
to bring back flagship (and presumably workhorse #2) .. that scenario
did not (and does not) make sense .. other scenarios however imo *do*
Quote:
PTOI is delinquent on a number of things - does filing the K absolve them of filing 8Ks regarding expiration of MAs, or notes payable coming due in Dec 2018?
PTOI is the stock .. P2O is the company .. the stock is not delinquent .. the company however is delinquent in holding an AGM (if memory serves .. AGM
is supposed to be held every 18 months) .. that said there is a cost to holding
an AGM .. as for expiration of CEO's notes payable and RC's investors' intent re: MA .. that is significant and why *i* have noted RH's pattern change out over the last 3 months .. RH has never not failed to *file* .. but December 2018 he did
so the ? becomes *why* then?
Quote:
Whether the K is filed or not - there is no excuse for the lack of communication from this management team.
you and everyone else with interest can go back to 2014 and read my posts
specific to CEO's *less than stellar communication skill sets*
it is beyond frustrating .. that said i also recognize that PTOI (the stock) has been illegally manipulated since 2009 .. and because of said manipulation .. perhaps the CEO finally figured out .. the only route for P2O to take that NR can't relentlessly manipulate PTOI .. is to deliver a sequence of material events that can't be *reset* yet again
the point of my post .. is that all with interest will know what CEO's intent is *shortly*
.. because no one would expend the financial resources to file a K if the intent is to shutter P2O?
if the K isn't filed .. i would presume the worst
if the K is filed .. i would expect a long and detailed explanation to accompany filing
if the K is filed sans an update .. it tells me that timing is still in play specific to P2O's options
and yes *imo* contrary to *some* .. P2O (the company) has numerous options
some far more appealing to me than others ..
4kids
(1)
(0)