No badgering or yelling needed but as we quietly await Friday and to all who are in the clouds with ONCI ... I agree with tigerpac ... there should be NO censorship... we all deserve to know real facts... I agree with turn144 as well...
Some here want to keep a blind eye... maybe because they've not been screwed enough yet in OTC by unscrupulous CEOs who know they can do almost anything and even get away with it...
So here's a fact:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/learn/prohibited-s...-providers
This morning I emailed OTC Markets inquiring about why this attorney is on the "Prohibited" list... no response yet but it'll be here IF I get a response.
Yet ANOTHER "Prohibited" attorney hired by SB... WHY? Are there not a gazillion attorneys in the U.S. (rhetorical)...
Granted we wait for and expect the quarterly filing by Friday (two days) but that's no excuse to get another "Prohibited" attorney... instead of the pps climbing on the potential of a great quarterly filing ahead, it's in limbo... almost staggering... there's no faith or trust or confidence in the CEO or company... in the gutter of OTC again!
And btw, I still believe the Attorney Letter which confirms the 'Annual' filing's information should be out before Friday (if it's not out, the 'yield' sign will remain)... it has nothing to do with the upcoming new quarterly filing which according to CEO should be out by end of Friday... and it's the actual quarterly that can have an additional 15 days (that's beyond Friday) to come out/be paid... that's the normal process with any and all of these non-SEC reporting pinks.
I will admit that submitting a Form 1-A offering statement to the SEC is a good thing because they supposedly check out the numbers (it's a requirement even by a non-SEC reporting pink to do it through the SEC so it's done for ONCI )... but there are so many unanswered questions and other things being done in seemingly strange ways... WHY, WHY, WHY?
We get DE debt resolved, does nothing for the stock's pps... we get share reduction, does nothing for the stock's pps... any other pink might have skyrocketed by now... so again, WHY, WHY, WHY?
So when the pps is up a tick or two or three, everyone's happy and positive... when it goes down a tick or two or three, shareholders question and become skeptical... even negative... but it's all up to the CEO to have something real enough he/she can be confident to share and be open about.
I can afford to lose what I've put into ONCI and realize that may not be the case for many here but I've been hurt, screwed and lost a lot before and I don't want to go there again... understand that many don't want to see the pps go further down, lose their funds or not be able to make more money on ONCI ... but the truth beats all and tells all... and, for me at least, a CEO should be honest, candid, communicative, transparent, follow through on his/her own word...especially when there is indeed a real company/business ... many keep questioning even here... realize there are other players and factors involved with a public company but this is OTC and I've seen CEOs, spoken with CEOs, met CEOs who've messed shareholders over and over...
And please Mr. CEO, don't tell me to move on because that would be STUPID on your part... just deliver on your own word if you're a man of your word, reputable, have any integrity or worth a damn.
Transparency and follow through with third party proof is needed and necessary... even with one like ONCI that's in some ways been quite different in OTC.
To each his/her own... believe or don't, no sweat off my back....
Very best to all with ONCI/HEXA !
Some here want to keep a blind eye... maybe because they've not been screwed enough yet in OTC by unscrupulous CEOs who know they can do almost anything and even get away with it...
So here's a fact:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/learn/prohibited-s...-providers
Quote:Matheau J. W. Stout Matheau J.W. Stout, Esq Baltimore, MD 15-Oct-18
This morning I emailed OTC Markets inquiring about why this attorney is on the "Prohibited" list... no response yet but it'll be here IF I get a response.
Yet ANOTHER "Prohibited" attorney hired by SB... WHY? Are there not a gazillion attorneys in the U.S. (rhetorical)...
Granted we wait for and expect the quarterly filing by Friday (two days) but that's no excuse to get another "Prohibited" attorney... instead of the pps climbing on the potential of a great quarterly filing ahead, it's in limbo... almost staggering... there's no faith or trust or confidence in the CEO or company... in the gutter of OTC again!
And btw, I still believe the Attorney Letter which confirms the 'Annual' filing's information should be out before Friday (if it's not out, the 'yield' sign will remain)... it has nothing to do with the upcoming new quarterly filing which according to CEO should be out by end of Friday... and it's the actual quarterly that can have an additional 15 days (that's beyond Friday) to come out/be paid... that's the normal process with any and all of these non-SEC reporting pinks.
I will admit that submitting a Form 1-A offering statement to the SEC is a good thing because they supposedly check out the numbers (it's a requirement even by a non-SEC reporting pink to do it through the SEC so it's done for ONCI )... but there are so many unanswered questions and other things being done in seemingly strange ways... WHY, WHY, WHY?
We get DE debt resolved, does nothing for the stock's pps... we get share reduction, does nothing for the stock's pps... any other pink might have skyrocketed by now... so again, WHY, WHY, WHY?
So when the pps is up a tick or two or three, everyone's happy and positive... when it goes down a tick or two or three, shareholders question and become skeptical... even negative... but it's all up to the CEO to have something real enough he/she can be confident to share and be open about.
I can afford to lose what I've put into ONCI and realize that may not be the case for many here but I've been hurt, screwed and lost a lot before and I don't want to go there again... understand that many don't want to see the pps go further down, lose their funds or not be able to make more money on ONCI ... but the truth beats all and tells all... and, for me at least, a CEO should be honest, candid, communicative, transparent, follow through on his/her own word...especially when there is indeed a real company/business ... many keep questioning even here... realize there are other players and factors involved with a public company but this is OTC and I've seen CEOs, spoken with CEOs, met CEOs who've messed shareholders over and over...
And please Mr. CEO, don't tell me to move on because that would be STUPID on your part... just deliver on your own word if you're a man of your word, reputable, have any integrity or worth a damn.
Transparency and follow through with third party proof is needed and necessary... even with one like ONCI that's in some ways been quite different in OTC.
To each his/her own... believe or don't, no sweat off my back....
Very best to all with ONCI/HEXA !
10
