absolutely agree and you are correct but what
Post# of 43064
but what is interesting and imo a significant change out
Quote:
As part of the settlement, Cantor also agreed to retain an independent consultant to conduct a comprehensive review of the firm’s policies, systems, procedures and training related to Reg SHO.
http://www.finra.org/newsroom/2019/finra-fine...upervisory
i used to post that if the requirement was total transparency .. the entire US equities' system would collapse under the weight of *revelations* .. but i also noted
that imo change would be implemented so slowly as to almost be negligible (specific to loopholes' exploited by NR) ..
imo they (NR) all collude .. but as more and more skeletons get exposed to the sunlight
and *change* is introduced with a goal of total transparency (could be another decade being implemented) ..
it is nice to see retails' education and mgmt's' awareness increase exponentially
imo NR is significantly upside down on PTOI .. here's to mgmt striking NR where it hurts them the most .. $$$$
a far higher cost than 2M$
edit .. been documenting CANT (and other MMs) for years now on both PTOI and IPIX
4kids
2 million is a joke to those brutal traders, scammers. Perhaps a more appropriate fine would be 20 million or even better 200 million. A fine has to address the crime and be a deterrent for future misdeeds.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/633...z5hVOoCBs3