hypotheticals are difficult perhaps just me (ba
Post# of 72446
(Total Views: 253)
Posted On: 03/06/2019 1:41:47 PM
hypotheticals are difficult
perhaps just me (based on how mgmt responded in 2015)
but i'd like to believe Innovation mgmt rolls out a sequence
of material events .. timed .. so that NR doesn't get a foothold
to reset significantly backward .. personally i see the $3.00 to $5.00 range
worth documenting ( volume .. MMs .. hiddens .. DRS %s ) based on
what was done in/from 2014 to 2015 into 2016 .. then *imo* if NR can't reset
significantly .. i actually see a pps projection (noted previously) that
NR almost has to take IPIX to .. (again this imo really doesn't pertain
to *market cap* .. rather 4 years and x number of months of suppression
efforts )
someone here kindly pointed out AMRN .. which i then studied (not invested)
to see how handled .. imo that trajectory can easily align with IPIX .. tho' if memory serves
IPIX currently has a lower I/O and Float .. which may well add $3 to $5 to *handling*
regardless with Innovation's execution
imo NR will re-work IPIX (honestly i strongly suspect the volume injected last Q of 2018 is a large part of what imo NR recognized had to be done for going forward)
and imo odds are that re-working will settle in at a price point that is held and worked (time wise) until mgmt delivers another *knock out* filing .. allowing NR zero respite
i am beyond fed up with *targeted* mgmts' appeasing NRs' extortionist ways
that said .. (uggggh) .. i do understand why it's done as repugnant as it is
this is why imo mgmt's awareness is key to NRs' bullsh*t .. because it allows mgmt to strategize options in *anticipation*
4kids
At what point does NR throw up their hands and say, screw IPIX, we can work other startups and make more money much easier? Or are we saddled with this sorry lot for good?
Once NR sees that IPIX doesn't have to issue stock to meet operational costs and IPIX starts gaining additional partnerships, is there any reason for them to stay other than stubbornness and not wanting to be seen as losing for a change?
My own opinion is that we still see massive peaks and valleys after the first partnership is signed. If others see the same thing and everyone is going to sell a portion of their holdings at the first slowdown in price appreciation after the announcement of the deal, then the peak/valley scenario becomes almost a certainty.
This stock doesn't appear easy to figure out even after things start going our way in terms of incoming cash and market acceptance.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/873...z5hQ0u6Uid
perhaps just me (based on how mgmt responded in 2015)
but i'd like to believe Innovation mgmt rolls out a sequence
of material events .. timed .. so that NR doesn't get a foothold
to reset significantly backward .. personally i see the $3.00 to $5.00 range
worth documenting ( volume .. MMs .. hiddens .. DRS %s ) based on
what was done in/from 2014 to 2015 into 2016 .. then *imo* if NR can't reset
significantly .. i actually see a pps projection (noted previously) that
NR almost has to take IPIX to .. (again this imo really doesn't pertain
to *market cap* .. rather 4 years and x number of months of suppression
efforts )
someone here kindly pointed out AMRN .. which i then studied (not invested)
to see how handled .. imo that trajectory can easily align with IPIX .. tho' if memory serves
IPIX currently has a lower I/O and Float .. which may well add $3 to $5 to *handling*
regardless with Innovation's execution
imo NR will re-work IPIX (honestly i strongly suspect the volume injected last Q of 2018 is a large part of what imo NR recognized had to be done for going forward)
and imo odds are that re-working will settle in at a price point that is held and worked (time wise) until mgmt delivers another *knock out* filing .. allowing NR zero respite
i am beyond fed up with *targeted* mgmts' appeasing NRs' extortionist ways
that said .. (uggggh) .. i do understand why it's done as repugnant as it is
this is why imo mgmt's awareness is key to NRs' bullsh*t .. because it allows mgmt to strategize options in *anticipation*
4kids
At what point does NR throw up their hands and say, screw IPIX, we can work other startups and make more money much easier? Or are we saddled with this sorry lot for good?
Once NR sees that IPIX doesn't have to issue stock to meet operational costs and IPIX starts gaining additional partnerships, is there any reason for them to stay other than stubbornness and not wanting to be seen as losing for a change?
My own opinion is that we still see massive peaks and valleys after the first partnership is signed. If others see the same thing and everyone is going to sell a portion of their holdings at the first slowdown in price appreciation after the announcement of the deal, then the peak/valley scenario becomes almost a certainty.
This stock doesn't appear easy to figure out even after things start going our way in terms of incoming cash and market acceptance.
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/873...z5hQ0u6Uid
(6)
(0)