the issue imo is the difference between legal and

the issue imo is the difference between legal and abusive
and how *handled/reported* by NR (non retail)

while difficult to do .. folks need to take emotions out of the equation
and think back to what was done on IPIX then CTIX
specific to time period of 2013/2014 .. i refer to this undertaking by NR
as working cycles of money .. and literally that works for NR until it doesn't

and that is why after IPIX (CTIX) saw the *run up to $4.96 (from memory so i may be off)
in late December 2014 .. the next round in play was the hand off for the reset back down

this is why i noted months back about the *volume* and the cost of those *trades*
re: *volume avgs*

so as NR struggled to work the round down from the run up ($4.96) .. IPIX (CTIX) was doing on avg 500,000 to 600,000 in *volume* at far higher price point than recent *rounds*

any way it is sliced .. for over 4 years now .. NR has relentlessly worked IPIX (CTIX) down

and has done so on less *volume* .. until of course 9.12.18

i'd noted in early September 2018 that NRs' struggle re: volume maintenance was signifiant (again total volume up thru EO August 2018 was running ..again from memory so may be off slightly .. 10M to 11M *less* than the same time frame of 2017) .. this was while PPS relentless compression was effectively cut in half from then 70c (and the reason imo it took NR so long to slice and dice was due to mgmt's cusip/ticker change out which imo delayed NRs' time frame) to approx 35c

i also noted that imo NR would have to address the volume deficiency because
NR imo had literally squeezed out retail traders .. retail rarely *legally shorts* an OTC .. however trading crews and NR does and will .. but that is just the icing on NRs' cake

Innovation Pharma filed their annual (K) AH's on 9.11.18 .. and *volume* was underway on 9.12.18 .. smarter folks than i suspected what NR gleaned was the term sheet included in the filing .. hard to know one way or the other if that was what triggered the *absurdly bizarre overkill re: IPIX's volume* over the next several months .. to the point where the *volume* YTD to EO August was *surpassed* significantly by the *volume* of 9.12.18 to 12.31.18 .. an oddity for sure

but with NRs' usual relentless playbook MO of compressing IPIX (mid 30c range to 7c from September 2018 to December 2018)

all the while .. most with interest could recognize that either IPIX (CTIX) was illegally manipulated UP at the EO 2014 .. or IPIX was being illegally manipulated
down afterward .. NR can't have it both ways .. so the ? imo actual investors had to ask themselves was .. has Innovation Pharma delivered measurable progress .. and if so is that progress today farther along now than in December 2014?

almost always (hate absolutes but imo this one fits) .. there are usually only 2 ways for an investor to be parted from their investment

one is to take the PPS high enough .. the other is to compress the PPS low enough

NR can and has timed efforts to NRs' trading crews .. which is why you see posts
starting in mid October *extolling* tax loss selling .. or BK .. or the usual incessant whining re: company's PPS .. as if the PPS wasn't the easiest aspect NR controls
>> literally <<

it's pretty clear the MO NR has executed against IPIX (CTIX) since 2015

at some point in September 2018 .. an *entity* or two figured out that *volume* needed to be injected .. which came as no surprise to me .. it's hard for multi/s
to scream *sells* 24/7/365 .. when IPIX's *volume* had gone cliff diving

this also pertains to *liquidity* (and imo for the most part .. not all .. it's bogus specific to volume engendered since 9.12.18)

think of 500000 in avg daily volume with a PPS of $2.50 .. that is $1,250,000.00
done daily dollar wise .. now take that same $1,250.000.00 with a .15c PPS and the daily volume avg works out to (approx) 8M and change .. something that even NR with their last round of *volume* injection didn't come close to

so as much as the multi/s and NR entities' scream and spew .. every investor (new or old) should imo understand 3 facts ..

Innovation's mgmt is clearly aware (and imo has been since their aggressive response of NRs' SOP BS of 2015) .. which matters imo specific to timing/sequence of mgmt's execution going forward

volume maintenance is a struggle for NR regardless of how compressed stock is worked
currently worth noting .. 10/90 day avgs (algos) @ approx 560,000~ per
showing that NRs' struggle remains an indication that investors remain *invested*
(imo NR is slowly but surely working IPIX upward .. but as previously noted doing
so *subtly* as to almost not be noticeable)

IPIX currently

Volume 198,512
Volume (10 day Average) 56 6,853
Volume (90 day Average) 56 2,283

last but not least .. Innovation's platform diversity .. which has to be the biggest gamble NR took against Innovation Pharma years back .. and imo has lost


i hope in my lifetime .. i see total transparency .. because i shudder to think of coming generations having no faith in a system so rotten .. that they either *trade* or never invest

i've watched too many legitimate companies be destroyed because of *greed*
imo the cost to our society overall is immense re: loss specific to technology/jobs/revenue/stability

at some point .. a rotten system collapses in total ..

and while there are no guarantees in this lifetime .. imo if one can understand
how and what NR does (why is easy .. it's $ and lots of it) and that includes targets/mgmts .. and one can truly recognize their own risk/reward tolerance ..
those who outlast/survive are usually epic in how handled .. and that *epic* aspect increases exponentially for each subsequent year of *outlasting/survival*

most targets .. don't


4kids

A seemingly simplistic (and unrealistic) solution would be for a stock to be able to ask that it be halted for trading for 3 days, thus all prior trades would have to be closed and at the end of the 3 day halt it would in effect have become a T+0 stock for that brief period of time, though that brief time would allow regulatory bodies time to see how many naked shares didn't get accounted for.

Wouldn't that square away the trades that are constantly being rotated thru the system allowing the naked shorts to survive?

Give just a 2 day notice prior to shutdown so investors needing money over that 3 day halt could sell some shares prior to shutdown if need be.

As stated above, obviously too simplistic an answer to the naked short problem but it would sure help put a lid on the outrageously allowed scam being perpetuated daily on the small retail investor.

Read More: https://investorshangout.com/post/newpost/873...z5hPk1pEwo