I just sent off the following email to "Eligigilit
Post# of 82672
(Total Views: 477)
Posted On: 03/05/2019 11:39:30 AM
I just sent off the following email to "Eligigility2019@USPTO.gov"
Director Iancu:
I would like to thank you for your initiative to resolve the 101 mayhem. Your subject matter eligibility guidance will help with most of the 101 problems if interpreted and implemented properly by the examiners and PTAB judges. Therefore, the highest risk to your subject matter eligibility guidance is the interpretation and implementation by the examiners and PTAB judges. The following are suggestions on how to further improve the guidance and how to ensure its correct interpretation and implementation
I wholeheartedly support your effort to resolve the 101 ambiguity and mayhem that currently exists within our courts. I am currently following a patent infringement case between Strikeforce Technologies vs Secure Authority, in which the appeal decision handed down by the Federal Court of appeals was made in support of Secure Authority, declaring “Affirmed”, under Rule 36.The judges apparently could not even be bothered to provide an explanation to their decision, and instead applied the court’s “bypass” Rule 36, allowing them to simply move it out of their court, in complete disregard to precedence set by SCOTUS and USPTO rulings!
I personally feel that the 3 judge panel failed to completely understand the patented technology, and legal precedence in the underlying issues within the infringement lawsuit, and therefore sought to escape such embarrassment by simply using the Rule 36 available to them! We must seek complete and undeniable clarification within the powers of SCOTUS and USPTO, to correct this issue, and prevent such in the future! We totally support your effort!
Thank you again for your effort, and for taking the time solicit feedback on the issues.
Respectfully,
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/messages/view?id...z5hJfRqU00
Director Iancu:
I would like to thank you for your initiative to resolve the 101 mayhem. Your subject matter eligibility guidance will help with most of the 101 problems if interpreted and implemented properly by the examiners and PTAB judges. Therefore, the highest risk to your subject matter eligibility guidance is the interpretation and implementation by the examiners and PTAB judges. The following are suggestions on how to further improve the guidance and how to ensure its correct interpretation and implementation
I wholeheartedly support your effort to resolve the 101 ambiguity and mayhem that currently exists within our courts. I am currently following a patent infringement case between Strikeforce Technologies vs Secure Authority, in which the appeal decision handed down by the Federal Court of appeals was made in support of Secure Authority, declaring “Affirmed”, under Rule 36.The judges apparently could not even be bothered to provide an explanation to their decision, and instead applied the court’s “bypass” Rule 36, allowing them to simply move it out of their court, in complete disregard to precedence set by SCOTUS and USPTO rulings!
I personally feel that the 3 judge panel failed to completely understand the patented technology, and legal precedence in the underlying issues within the infringement lawsuit, and therefore sought to escape such embarrassment by simply using the Rule 36 available to them! We must seek complete and undeniable clarification within the powers of SCOTUS and USPTO, to correct this issue, and prevent such in the future! We totally support your effort!
Thank you again for your effort, and for taking the time solicit feedback on the issues.
Respectfully,
Read More: https://investorshangout.com/messages/view?id...z5hJfRqU00
(7)
(0)Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
SFOR STRONG!!! GO SFOR!!!
Scroll down for more posts ▼