In my opinion the rule was designed for clearing o

In my opinion the rule was designed for clearing out cases that are simplistic and that they meet one of the standards easily. It should be easy enough to see it from a legal perspective. From a laymen’s perspective it would be difficult but could be explained. It will not be as Mark did explain that it was not what was expected and is very distressing given the facts of our case.The point of showing the rule was to show that no one here can say what was wrong and how the judges decided to throw us out on a rule 36. They use this as a way to dismiss 60 percent of the cases. That means if they don’t understand what’s being argued they punt with no explanation. Now that we are going to appeal it again we need to move past the three panel judges and be very simple in our approach as the judges do not understand the basic concept of our patents and what we SFOR does and how it has been affected. Uphill battle but good to see us move forward. Bear!