My take after some DD. “Any thoughts regarding y

My take after some DD. “Any thoughts regarding yesterday's ruling in the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals regarding SFOR Technologies vs Secure Authority, in which the 3 judge panel ruled "Affirmed", based on Rule 36?” I will start that I am not an attorney that being said there seems to be a mistake. The appellate judges should have served us an opinion as a matter of due process. Though the court can rule based on 36 they should have attached their opinion unless we have fundamental mistakes that are outlined in the rule. In this case they can issue “affirmed” without an opinion. From what I have read the court should have issued their opinion to offer why our Appeal was not correct and the California judge was initially correct and SA was not violating our patent. I personally feel that we have a violation of rights for a second appeal that ZPaul has showed us already in docket. I am guessing we have some but few courses we can take on the case. 1) file the appeal based off of due process according to our rights based of our confirmed status. 2) talk to our legal council to see if we made any simple mistakes that warranted the no response action. 3) negotiate a settlement to stop all further action against SA. My guess is SA was probably elated by the response but there is a fundamental problem in that there is no opinion.. That cause concern for all parties as it gives no finality! I would think both parties would talk about this as a reasonable possibility to settle now as the court violated the rights of SFOR. I don’t see any other outcomes that are real and SA gets off cheap by terms of what should have happened.or what is fair. It also creates issue back to DUO as no opinion leaves it open ended with their deal even though they were happy as well from the decision. ( No opinion causes a delima.) I see that if we force the judges to write an opinion we would be shooting ourselves in the foot as they clearly do not understand our logic, or the hard core facts in our case that could be explained a little easier if it had to be. Enough to overturn their initial ruling? No in my humble opinion as egos are on the line that they ruled incorrectly! We have to go up the chain from what I have read and 5.6 percent of theses cases are heard from the Supreme Court. Do I think we have a shot? Yes. I think we have an opportunity but I see the Supreme Court as last resort and way more money than our financed legal team would want to take on. So I am waiting to see what tam SFOR does here as our Legal team has to regroup with options. I am betting that no information out of anyone at SFOR is prudent as no direction can be had until they know their rights to this bombastic ruling with no opinion. My few thoughts for Today. Peace Bear.