So we don't know if the 21 well pre-funded drilling program as quoted by Pistol to TECO needed to stay with the original intended lease or the same contract with Pistol Drilling could be performed on any lease and on any 21 potential wells with permits? That implies and I assume the quote that went out from Pistol to TECO to drill 21 wells could include any 21 wells and it might be smart to choose wells with the best odds of the highest production. I don't know which blame TECO has more than the other; lack of transparency on their drilling programs or the constant misleading revenue/BPD over the last year. As usual something doesn't smell right here and it's their lack of credibility that makes it hard for me to trust TECO's decisions. Seems to be a lot "bait and switch" going on.
