Renenber the SFOR's patent was ruled invalid by th
Post# of 82672
(Total Views: 676)
Posted On: 02/06/2019 7:35:33 PM
Renenber the SFOR's patent was ruled invalid by the California judge based on the Alice 101 (abstract idea).
In the federal oral argument, the SA's lawyer kept using Alice 103 (obviousness) reasonings and even the judge had to remind him twice that it was Alice 101 in discussion. Do you think SA's lawyer has any meaningful Alice 101 reasonings at hands on that day? None! Otherwise, he would have had used that for his defense.
And why did he spend so much time arguing SFOR's patent is not computer specific? Because he is trying hard to trick the judge for not using the case Ancora Technologies v HTC America as a precedent which means game over for SA. But is it not computer specific? Even the judge said "You can't mean that."
Which federal judge in his right mind would affirm the Alice 101 ruling base on Alice 103 arguments? I think the answer is very clear and no worries here.
In the federal oral argument, the SA's lawyer kept using Alice 103 (obviousness) reasonings and even the judge had to remind him twice that it was Alice 101 in discussion. Do you think SA's lawyer has any meaningful Alice 101 reasonings at hands on that day? None! Otherwise, he would have had used that for his defense.
And why did he spend so much time arguing SFOR's patent is not computer specific? Because he is trying hard to trick the judge for not using the case Ancora Technologies v HTC America as a precedent which means game over for SA. But is it not computer specific? Even the judge said "You can't mean that."
Which federal judge in his right mind would affirm the Alice 101 ruling base on Alice 103 arguments? I think the answer is very clear and no worries here.
(13)
(0)Zerify Inc (ZRFY) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼