$IDNG: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTR
Post# of 103017
(Total Views: 381)
Posted On: 02/06/2019 4:16:24 PM
$IDNG: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
REDHAWK HOLDINGS, CORP., ET AL CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS NUMBER: 17-0819
DANIEL J. SCHREIBER TRUSTEE, ET AL SECTION: “B” (2)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that all of the parties to this
action have firmly agreed upon a compromise .
IT IS ORDERED that the action be and is hereby dismissed without costs and without
prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown, to reopen the action or to seek summary judgment
enforcing the compromise if settlement is not consummated. The Court retains jurisdiction for all
purposes, including enforcing the settlement agreement entered into by the parties for a reasonable
period of time. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 US 375,
381-82 (1994); Hospitality House, Inc. v. Gilbert, 298 F.3d 424, 430 (5th Cir. 2002).
COUNSEL ARE REMINDED THAT, IF WITNESSES HAVE BEEN
SUBPOENAED, EVERY WITNESS MUST BE NOTIFIED BY COUNSEL NOT TO
APPEAR.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL PENDING MOTIONS BETWEEN
SETTLING PARTIES ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 6th day of February 2019.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1FaH50YH6w8a...jyszVKWF1L
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
REDHAWK HOLDINGS, CORP., ET AL CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS NUMBER: 17-0819
DANIEL J. SCHREIBER TRUSTEE, ET AL SECTION: “B” (2)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that all of the parties to this
action have firmly agreed upon a compromise .
IT IS ORDERED that the action be and is hereby dismissed without costs and without
prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown, to reopen the action or to seek summary judgment
enforcing the compromise if settlement is not consummated. The Court retains jurisdiction for all
purposes, including enforcing the settlement agreement entered into by the parties for a reasonable
period of time. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2); Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 US 375,
381-82 (1994); Hospitality House, Inc. v. Gilbert, 298 F.3d 424, 430 (5th Cir. 2002).
COUNSEL ARE REMINDED THAT, IF WITNESSES HAVE BEEN
SUBPOENAED, EVERY WITNESS MUST BE NOTIFIED BY COUNSEL NOT TO
APPEAR.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL PENDING MOTIONS BETWEEN
SETTLING PARTIES ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 6th day of February 2019.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1FaH50YH6w8a...jyszVKWF1L
(0)
(0)
Sojourner here following God, obeying God, and cleaving to Him. The journey is onward.
Scroll down for more posts ▼