You have to admit that this board seemed to insinu

You have to admit that this board seemed to insinuate that their lawyers were baboons. Imo the people selling never imagined the other side of the argument could be well articulated. Did they think the judges were going to swoon in the presence of our great lawyer? Of course not! ANY AND ALL sides/cases are questioned in this manner. I didn’t think this was a “slam dunk” but I do feel better about our chances. The judges seemed to counter A LOT more of what SA was saying compared to Dremeier. And when he was questioned he answered directly and at one point mentioned three prior cases and said because of those decisions it HAS TO AT THIS TIME BE ACCEPTED THAT IT IS AN IMPROVEMENT ON THE PRIOR ART. Opposing counsel at on point ignored the lady judges question.

You can question our patent all day long, and even if you dropped the Ancora precedent by saying that their patent was more “computer specific” we STILL have the PTAB decision and the SUPREME COURT which CANNOT be denied or mooted. I still think the judges don’t really have an option here. Sfor for the win!