Although I am not an attorney. I would think the c

Although I am not an attorney. I would think the court would have to put their ruling in writing after oral argument and their ruling for or against the parties. The Judges can do what they want but I assume they will have to put it in writing just from a procedural affair. The case will get pushed back to California and time is not on the side of any of our Patent infringers but its worked for them so far. The numbers and valuation are staggering. Duo sells for 2.35 billion in cash off of our technology? I get the users they brought in but it was done on our technology. I still have no idea how they were sold without a set aside to SFOR for its potential infringement unless SFOR ok'd it? The sell document would have all the information but it is not in any of Cisco's documents. .The Patent Trial and Appeal Board PTAB has constitutional authority to validate or invalidate a Patent. Strike Force has already been validated Twice on its Patent. The appellate judges should easily rule in our favor and not go against a supreme court ruling. If I am not mistaken the Judges will have already seen all documents to shed the true light on our case and what our Patents mean.. They are giving time for both sides to argue their points in Less than 20 minutes. This is going to be over soon and pushed back to California. Thats my take and I could be wrong.The Bear.