Judge Orders Discovery On Clinton Email And Bengha
Post# of 65628
(Total Views: 83)
Posted On: 01/16/2019 8:02:01 AM
Judge Orders Discovery On Clinton Email And Benghazi Scandals:
Top Obama Officials Must Answer Questions Under Oath
The noose is tightening. You hear that, Hillary? There’s a storm coming for you and all the cronies who followed your orders to break laws and put our country’s national security in jeopardy, all because they thought you were going to be president and their lawbreaking wouldn’t matter, because you would have swept it all under the rug.
Today Judicial Watch announced that U. S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that discovery will begin in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.
Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides will now be deposed under oath. They have had over two years to come up with corroborating lies, but they can’t escape the truth. Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act, and many of her aides may have as well.
Senior Obama officials, including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Jacob Sullivan, and FBI official E.W. Priestap, will now have to answer Judicial Watch’s written questions under oath.
The court rejected the DOJ and State Department’s objections to Judicial Watch’s court-ordered discovery plan.
First of all, why would the DOJ and State Department reject a discovery plan that is designed to get to the truth of serious crimes that were committed? To cover up for people who still work in both the DOJ and State Department. It sounds like their loyalties are still with Obama and Hillary Clinton and not the country.
Further, why did the establishment media not make a big deal about deep state people inside DOJ and State fighting discovery steps to look into serious crimes committed? Because they’ve been in collusion with the Obama-Clinton people all along covering for them every time a story comes up about the lawlessness that went on under the Obama regime. Can you imagine the selective outrage if this were the Trump administration?
Incidentally, the court while ordering a discovery plan last month, ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” Apparently, the judge doesn’t want to wipe this case off with a cloth.
Here’s what the JW discovery is looking at for answers:
Whether Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a non-government email system;
whether the State Department’s efforts to settle this case beginning in late 2014 amounted to bad faith; and
whether the State Department adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request.
From Judicial Watch:
Judge Lamberth ordered written responses under oath to Judicial Watch’s questions from Obama administration senior officials Rice, Rhodes and Sullivan, and former FBI official Priestap. Rice and Rhodes will answer interrogatories under oath on the Benghazi scandal. Rejecting the State and Justice Department objections to discovery on the infamous Benghazi talking points, Judge Lamberth reiterated:
Yet Rice’s talking points and State’s understanding of the attack play an unavoidably central role in this case: information about the points’ development and content, as well as their discussion and dissemination before and after Rice’s appearances could reveal unsearched, relevant records; State’s role in the points’ content and development could shed light on Clinton’s motives for shielding her emails from FOIA requesters or on State’s reluctance to search her emails.
Millions of Americans will never forget the day fired and disgraced former FBI Director James Comey laid out a perfect case to the nation on television that even a first-year law student could have gotten a number of convictions on, only to let Hillary Clinton off the hook.
He gave us bogus reasons for his decision and even usurped powers of the Attorney General, the FBI, and the judiciary in the process. I would love to see James Comey deposed, even though he has enough legal problems of his own at the moment for all the criminal things he did like violating the same statute of the Espionage Act by which he let Hillary Clinton off the hook.
It will be interesting to see how the establishment news media will spin this.
https://davidharrisjr.com/politics/judge-orde...Ie8R8LXizQ
Top Obama Officials Must Answer Questions Under Oath
The noose is tightening. You hear that, Hillary? There’s a storm coming for you and all the cronies who followed your orders to break laws and put our country’s national security in jeopardy, all because they thought you were going to be president and their lawbreaking wouldn’t matter, because you would have swept it all under the rug.
Today Judicial Watch announced that U. S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth ruled that discovery will begin in Hillary Clinton’s email scandal.
Obama administration senior State Department officials, lawyers, and Clinton aides will now be deposed under oath. They have had over two years to come up with corroborating lies, but they can’t escape the truth. Hillary Clinton violated the Espionage Act, and many of her aides may have as well.
Senior Obama officials, including Susan Rice, Ben Rhodes, Jacob Sullivan, and FBI official E.W. Priestap, will now have to answer Judicial Watch’s written questions under oath.
The court rejected the DOJ and State Department’s objections to Judicial Watch’s court-ordered discovery plan.
First of all, why would the DOJ and State Department reject a discovery plan that is designed to get to the truth of serious crimes that were committed? To cover up for people who still work in both the DOJ and State Department. It sounds like their loyalties are still with Obama and Hillary Clinton and not the country.
Further, why did the establishment media not make a big deal about deep state people inside DOJ and State fighting discovery steps to look into serious crimes committed? Because they’ve been in collusion with the Obama-Clinton people all along covering for them every time a story comes up about the lawlessness that went on under the Obama regime. Can you imagine the selective outrage if this were the Trump administration?
Incidentally, the court while ordering a discovery plan last month, ruled that the Clinton email system was “one of the gravest modern offenses to government transparency.” Apparently, the judge doesn’t want to wipe this case off with a cloth.
Here’s what the JW discovery is looking at for answers:
Whether Clinton intentionally attempted to evade the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by using a non-government email system;
whether the State Department’s efforts to settle this case beginning in late 2014 amounted to bad faith; and
whether the State Department adequately searched for records responsive to Judicial Watch’s FOIA request.
From Judicial Watch:
Judge Lamberth ordered written responses under oath to Judicial Watch’s questions from Obama administration senior officials Rice, Rhodes and Sullivan, and former FBI official Priestap. Rice and Rhodes will answer interrogatories under oath on the Benghazi scandal. Rejecting the State and Justice Department objections to discovery on the infamous Benghazi talking points, Judge Lamberth reiterated:
Yet Rice’s talking points and State’s understanding of the attack play an unavoidably central role in this case: information about the points’ development and content, as well as their discussion and dissemination before and after Rice’s appearances could reveal unsearched, relevant records; State’s role in the points’ content and development could shed light on Clinton’s motives for shielding her emails from FOIA requesters or on State’s reluctance to search her emails.
Millions of Americans will never forget the day fired and disgraced former FBI Director James Comey laid out a perfect case to the nation on television that even a first-year law student could have gotten a number of convictions on, only to let Hillary Clinton off the hook.
He gave us bogus reasons for his decision and even usurped powers of the Attorney General, the FBI, and the judiciary in the process. I would love to see James Comey deposed, even though he has enough legal problems of his own at the moment for all the criminal things he did like violating the same statute of the Espionage Act by which he let Hillary Clinton off the hook.
It will be interesting to see how the establishment news media will spin this.
https://davidharrisjr.com/politics/judge-orde...Ie8R8LXizQ
(1)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼