Well said Grow and strongly agree....
"Hearing "reverse" will be profound. Investors will notice. The arguments against the patents will have fallen away. It will mark the end of the legal maneuvering the infringers have been playing, and they will come to the table in good faith for settlement discussions over the following weeks.
IMO cases will settle with non-disclosure agreements after hearing support from the appeals court. If they don't settle, the lower courts will have trials where $ amounts are decided publicly. The legal team for SFOR (R&G) may consider taking a remanded appeal case through to a completed trial at a district court. Whether through non-disclosure agreements or through court orders, we will see money show up on the balance sheet of SFOR anyway."
"Hearing "reverse" will be profound. Investors will notice. The arguments against the patents will have fallen away. It will mark the end of the legal maneuvering the infringers have been playing, and they will come to the table in good faith for settlement discussions over the following weeks.
IMO cases will settle with non-disclosure agreements after hearing support from the appeals court. If they don't settle, the lower courts will have trials where $ amounts are decided publicly. The legal team for SFOR (R&G) may consider taking a remanded appeal case through to a completed trial at a district court. Whether through non-disclosure agreements or through court orders, we will see money show up on the balance sheet of SFOR anyway."
