Maybe so, but he's earned our scrutiny as well as
Post# of 75381
(Total Views: 474)
Posted On: 01/10/2019 7:14:44 AM
Maybe so, but he's earned our scrutiny as well as our complete disapproval on several posts that many never saw because they were quickly deleted.
If people aren't aware of the inherent risks involved with investing in small start up companies, there is a wealth of great reading out there to learn from. The better information won't paint a gloomy outlook for this particular start up. Especially once all of the facts are accounted for.
Most brokers hate that inherent risk because of the potential harm it can do to their reputations and therefore their livelihood, so they throw a "blanket" over penny stocks which basically says we should simply avoid them. They just don't want the risk, but for those willing to take that risk, the rewards can be tremendous.
When the subject matter in a post is ridiculously lacking in fact and it's mixed with a heavy dose of Chicken Little, it's gone. I don't even particularly care for the over-the-top pumping that quite often hits the board when flippers are trying to get the pps to climb, but at least those fluffy posts aren't harmful to a legitimate company. A company for which evidence suggests that major catalysts have already been put in place that will generate huge profits.
It's tough enough for a well established fortune 500 company to provide shareholders with highly accurate guidance, but flippers will often run their yappers and hammer away at a small OTC start up for being off by as little as a few weeks on any guidance they provided. That's why the kind of transparency this company has provided to shareholders is a rarity on the OTC.
The slanderous BS is potentially harmful to a company. If I believed even a tiny bit that this company was running a scam or only that it was likely to fail, I would recoup as much of my investment as possible and move to other prospects, letting the manipulative flippers/bashholes have their way with this board. I would not leave before adding my own warnings to investors. This company, however, is instead a rare opportunity for huge long term gains. Even huge relatively short term gains at this point in their development.
I'm still here because I believe that. I truly believe that this company will be hugely successful, and much sooner than it ever would have been prior to the changes at HQ and the acquisition of the current financing arrangement.
We need to try and keep the BS factor in check. Again, you haven't seen most of the deleted posts. If I had the time I would copy all of them first, just to show skeptics the justification for the deletion. Of course, a LieHub bashhole would still argue for "freedom of speech" (even pure BS), but they already have LieHub to pitch that bullshit. We don't need it over here too. We can just look over their if we want to be fed some twisted speculation or pure bullshit.
If people aren't aware of the inherent risks involved with investing in small start up companies, there is a wealth of great reading out there to learn from. The better information won't paint a gloomy outlook for this particular start up. Especially once all of the facts are accounted for.
Most brokers hate that inherent risk because of the potential harm it can do to their reputations and therefore their livelihood, so they throw a "blanket" over penny stocks which basically says we should simply avoid them. They just don't want the risk, but for those willing to take that risk, the rewards can be tremendous.
When the subject matter in a post is ridiculously lacking in fact and it's mixed with a heavy dose of Chicken Little, it's gone. I don't even particularly care for the over-the-top pumping that quite often hits the board when flippers are trying to get the pps to climb, but at least those fluffy posts aren't harmful to a legitimate company. A company for which evidence suggests that major catalysts have already been put in place that will generate huge profits.
It's tough enough for a well established fortune 500 company to provide shareholders with highly accurate guidance, but flippers will often run their yappers and hammer away at a small OTC start up for being off by as little as a few weeks on any guidance they provided. That's why the kind of transparency this company has provided to shareholders is a rarity on the OTC.
The slanderous BS is potentially harmful to a company. If I believed even a tiny bit that this company was running a scam or only that it was likely to fail, I would recoup as much of my investment as possible and move to other prospects, letting the manipulative flippers/bashholes have their way with this board. I would not leave before adding my own warnings to investors. This company, however, is instead a rare opportunity for huge long term gains. Even huge relatively short term gains at this point in their development.
I'm still here because I believe that. I truly believe that this company will be hugely successful, and much sooner than it ever would have been prior to the changes at HQ and the acquisition of the current financing arrangement.
We need to try and keep the BS factor in check. Again, you haven't seen most of the deleted posts. If I had the time I would copy all of them first, just to show skeptics the justification for the deletion. Of course, a LieHub bashhole would still argue for "freedom of speech" (even pure BS), but they already have LieHub to pitch that bullshit. We don't need it over here too. We can just look over their if we want to be fed some twisted speculation or pure bullshit.
(14)
(2)