Please ask yourself if you would extend the same 'pre-election statute of limitations' to a Dem.
No, we did not know what we were getting. Trump's meeting, in the same room and on tape, with Cohen and Pecker in '15, laid out the conspiracy to catch, kill or payoff Trump's accusers. Closer to the election that took the form of illegal campaign contributions.
And the Enquirer, AKA the conservative 'paper of record', and preferred reading matter in the 'righty library'.....supermarket checkout line....committed to helping Trump and smearing Clinton during the then upcoming campaign.
You'd really claim that was irrelevant to evaluating a sitting Dem president? Mirror handy? Please take the 'smile test' before responding.
Yeah, it will look just like that.
As for Mueller having 'had enough time'? Seriously? Check out the length of the Whitewater investigation or the more recent Benghazi hearings. .
You can't be patient for investigations into your political enemies and then impatient for a conclusion of same for your political preference, without admitting to double standards and hypocrisy.
Can't do it, not with a straight face.
No, we did not know what we were getting. Trump's meeting, in the same room and on tape, with Cohen and Pecker in '15, laid out the conspiracy to catch, kill or payoff Trump's accusers. Closer to the election that took the form of illegal campaign contributions.
And the Enquirer, AKA the conservative 'paper of record', and preferred reading matter in the 'righty library'.....supermarket checkout line....committed to helping Trump and smearing Clinton during the then upcoming campaign.
You'd really claim that was irrelevant to evaluating a sitting Dem president? Mirror handy? Please take the 'smile test' before responding.
Yeah, it will look just like that. As for Mueller having 'had enough time'? Seriously? Check out the length of the Whitewater investigation or the more recent Benghazi hearings. .
You can't be patient for investigations into your political enemies and then impatient for a conclusion of same for your political preference, without admitting to double standards and hypocrisy.
Can't do it, not with a straight face.
Quote:Donald Trump is the President, lets let him lead. What he did before being elected should not affect us. If he was on our payroll having his affairs I might be a bit peeved, but we knew what we were getting going in the door. For the record I don't like Trump all that much but, I like what he is trying to do. As for the colussion, Mueller has had enough time, present the proof of the colussion between TRUMP and the RUSSIANS and get off our payroll, Either way.
