I think the implication was that Sifthouse is deve
Post# of 40989
(Total Views: 183)
Posted On: 12/13/2018 3:55:25 PM
Re: Havenstein #22439
I think the implication was that Sifthouse is developing a technology not that they are actually going to be the growers. That's my take any way.
Quote:
Someone is saying sifthouse isn't growing pot but they are developing a technology. Maybe they're doing both. Steve said it's a boutique business that could sell everywhere pot is legal. If our partner does have a technology they can patent which improves mj production I will be as giddy as a schoolgirl.
(0)
(0)On4 Communications (ONCI) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼